Dual court system

Dual Court System
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

Introduction
The United States courts system plays a significant role in the judicial system. The dual court system apparent in the United States consists of the federal as well as the state court system which has distinct structures. The Supreme Court deals with the federal law through the interpretation of the matters regarding the state. However, federal courts determine the violation of the federal law by the state law. It is therefore clear that the judicial system components have different functions.
The drug courts are examples of the specialized courts that deals with the rehabilitation of the drug addicts. In various cases, the drug addicts can be influenced by criminal activities that may lead to severe effects. However, the drug courts have positive implications for the offenders and also the community. The paper explores the specialized drugs as well as their effectiveness in a nation. However, the consequences of the drug courts are evident in the paper.
Drug courts
The drug courts play a crucial role in enhancing mental health and the social service. The courts provide alternatives such as sentencing on the drug addicts as well as the people with mental disorders. The courts collaborate with the community to enhance the long-term recovery of the offenders.
Effects of the Drug Courts
Drug-related activities such as drug trafficking have affected the economic state in various countries. The utilization of the legal as well as the moral authority is a useful attribute in reducing the severe effects of drug addiction.

The drug courts have a comprehensive model. The court screens the offenders and assesses the risks associated with drug addiction or the mental disorder. The aspect of monitoring, as well as supervision, is also evident in the drug courts (Moreno & Curti, 2012). The court can enhance the provision of the rehabilitation service and other forms of treatment to the offenders. The management of the drug courts serves a vital role the provision of services to the victims. It entails a team including judges, social workers as well as the medical practitioners.
Effectiveness of the Drug Courts
The drug courts are a successful intervention in the United States for the people struggling with the drug addiction. The courts have improved the recovery process for the victims by improving the quality of life. The drug courts do not deal with punishing the offenders, but instead, they undergo a series of counseling. The issue of punishment cannot be an efficient way of dealing with drug addiction.
The drug courts keep the offenders in the real world rather than the facing imprisonment. The offenders can continue being crucial in the community thus attributing to the economic growth and development. The offenders continue to pay taxes while receiving the distinct forms of drug treatment. The judge assigns the drug court the offender who seems to be of critical importance to the society. Successful completion of the drug court leads to the removal of the offense from the records (Moore, 2012). The effectiveness of the drug courts is also apparent in the provision of educational training. The involvement of the treatment programs is vital for the offenders thus reducing drug addiction. The courts, however, reduces recidivism by resolving the issues which may lead to criminal activities.
Consideration for the specialized Courts
The specialized courts such as drug courts focus on the diagnostic approaches that create solutions to the community challenges. The courts are vulnerable to funding due to the high cost of treatment expenses. Despite, the high cost of treatment, the courts are more effective in comparison to the conventional approaches. The most important consideration for the specialized courts is the effectiveness. However, to enhance the efficacy of the organization, funds are required to cater for the daily operations.
The effectiveness of the specialized courts has been characterized by the court objectives. Some of the targets include linking the participants and monitoring the treatment plans. It is therefore evident that the stakeholders do not focus on the expenses but instead focus on the issue of service delivery (Moore, 2012).
The specialized courts are efficient by freeing the resources in the lower courts which many cases would be tried. The lower courts suffer from financial implications and inadequate facilities. The judges are assigned the courts that suit their area of expertise. It helps in service delivery and enhancement of innovativeness.
Conclusion
In summation, the judicial system has proved to be critical in promoting service delivery. The specialized courts including the drug courts play a salient role in enhancing soberness on the drug addicts. The courts provide an alternative solution in dealing with the criminal activities. However, the specialized courts experience financial implications due to the resources required for the service delivery. For instance, the issue of healthcare providers is a salient issue in service delivery.
The institution deploys the staff members with expertise in the areas of jurisdiction. The aspect of rehabilitation is also fundamental for the drug courts service delivery. Eventually, the effectiveness of the specialized courts is a central concern despite the cost incurred. Stakeholders and other entities should consent to enhance service delivery in the judicial system.
References
Moore, L. (2012). Measures of Success: Capturing the Impact of Drug Courts. SSRN Electronic
Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236482
Moreno, C., & Curti, G. (2012). Recovery spaces and therapeutic jurisprudence: a case study of
the family treatment drug courts. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(2), 161-183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2012.655768