Rights Of Sexuality And Invisibility In Society

Rights of sexuality and invisibility in society

Introduction

This essay is about the importance of sexuality as an opportunity for dialogue, from a reflexive and active position, entering the diachrony of benefits in the dissemination of the exercise of sexuality and the need to consider that over time the constantElawing gender stereotypes, mainly towards the ideal of the female body asShared Erotic Game, do not evoke the way with moralistic bases, therefore, there is repression and guilt that limit the free exercise of sexuality and sexual health. Reich (1985) states that over time it has been questioned “that sexual morals was a coverage that justified the existence of monogamic marriage. And that this, socially and ideologically, was at the service of a merely reproductive sexuality ”(P.9). If we add that from masculinity there is a series of discomforts to cover social standards, the most visible punishand inhabit our sexual territory, as well as live our sexuality fully. To gain ground, it is significant to enter rooted practices:

The individual is infused religious, social and political beliefs about what is adequate in sexual behavior and what is decent, moral, typical of the man, typical of women, a father, a mother, a daughter, a daughter,of a child, among others (child, and., 2011, p. 13).

Working with the issue of sexuality in a country according to INEGI (2010) with 84, 217,138 people of 5 years and over, who profess Catholicism, is not an easy task.

Moral (2010), affirms that “the family, as well as educational and religious institutions control sexual behavior through surveillance, punishment and stigmatization” (P. 46). Therefore, thinking about an educational system that opens a way to sexual education is undoubtedly a challenge, little by little more opportunities open, however, it is worth thinking about a teaching-learning process from a gender perspectiveotherwise they will continue to reproduce patriarchal fissures with social sequels.

Some authors of great relevance are cited in this work, in order to expand reflection and share knowledge.

Developing

Sexuality

To understand sexuality, it is necessary to cite some definitions that allow us to visualize the extensive range of the subject, it is significant to mention that there is not a single source that in its entireof the historical evolution of societies and cultures, the knowledge and practical into sexuality in a dynamic and non -linear way is also transformed.

Giraldo (1981) states that sexuality is the set of behavior phenomena certain idiosyncratic and culturally, through which the sexual impulse of each individual is manifested and satisfied. Reich (1985) ensures that sexuality is the previous condition for an inner and outer harmony of life that corresponds to human nature and its needs.

On the other hand, WHO (2006) defines sexuality as:

A central aspect of the human being that is present throughout his life. It covers sex, identities and gender roles, sexual orientation, eroticism, pleasure, intimacy and reproduction. It feels and expresses itself through thoughts, fantasies, desires, beliefs, attitudes, values, behaviors, practices, roles and relationships. While sexuality can include all these dimensions, not all of them are always experienced or expressed. Sexuality is influenced by the interaction of biological, psychological, social, economic, political, cultural, ethical, legal, religious and spiritual factors.

Through great efforts to study the spheres of sexuality, Rubio (1994) proposed the integration of four human potentialities that give rise to sexual subsystems, namely: reproductivity, gender, eroticism and interpersonal affective linkage (p.17). However, this model was currently expanded by Barrios (2010) He suggests that sex is another component, defining it as follows:

Sex refers to the biological dimension, which makes us different from the members of the same species, we must remember that it comes from the Latin “sectus” that means splitting, dividing, split by two, where we distinguish differences in the sameSpecies, differences in the body and function, that is sex and not only what we do in bed besides sleeping and watching TV (p.13).

Therefore, sexuality is conceived as an inherent part of the human being, is present from before birth, throughout development and until his death. So, it is inevitable to ask ourselves why this being the central axis of life, a series of limitations and taboos that slow the development of the exercise of sexuality have been put. We see that there is scientific information, which is not necessarily directed assertively, there is daily or common sense that it can be supported through prejudices that affect people’s lives and lack of scientific knowledge disadvantages interest andcommitment to know sexuality as a right, which is why we tend to reinforce limiting practices and representations based on the violation of sexual rights.

It is known that the State has the obligation to promote, respect, protect and guarantee our sexual rights in accordance with the principles of universality, interdependence, indivisibility and progressivity. Public policies designed and implemented by the State in the field of sexual rights must be governed by a secular framework, so that the self-determination of all people is promoted and the diverse needs and conditions of social vulnerability that we face adolescents and young people inAs for the exercise of our sexuality, as well as prevent, investigate, sanction and repair the violations of these rights in the terms established by law (CNDH, 2016, P.3)

That is, there are two aspects to take into account, one is to be aware that the State has the obligation to seek and facilitate the means so that all people fully live the development of their sexuality;Another point that goes hand in hand with what is cultivated within a society, is the daily practice of these knowledge, the way in which reality, shared space, sexed bodies and their interaction are perceived and perceived.

Moscovici (1985) states that:

The representations are registered in the body folds, in the provisions we have and in the gestures we perform. They form the substance of that habitus of which the ancients speak, which transforms a mass of instincts and organs into an orderly universe, into a human microcosm of the physical macrocosm, to the point of making our biology appear as a sociology and a psychology, ournature as a work of culture.

There is no doubt that society and culture mold our way of understanding reality, that is, the social environment facilitates us knowledge or anchor in limitations, as regards the exercise of sexuality, it is transcendental to connect with the power thatIt has been on the subject, despite being a country with a path polished by illustrious sexuality experts, we know that we still have a very big way to go. It is urgent to provide opportunities to acquire knowledge, unlearn and rename sexuality stories that were written with repression and under gender dogmas. The most pertinent will be to demystify the false beliefs that limit and sentence the bodies, Giraldo (1989) already said "the extent to which a person feels free to exercise their sexuality is closely related to their cultural values and beliefs" (p.269). That is, we need to encourage interest in knowing not only human rights, but also sexual rights to forge a firm platform in the practice of sexual health.

Sandoval (1997, cited in Díaz Vega and Rivera Mena, 2008, P. 89) points out that social representations have four social functions and that we can see the way they can influence the exercise of sexuality:

1. Understanding, a function that makes it possible to think about the world and its relationships and what is understood as sexuality exercise.
2. The assessment, which allows to qualify or prosecute facts about the exercise of sexuality.
3. Communication as a necessary axis, from which people interact through the creation and recreation of the social representations of the exercise of sexuality.
4. The action, which is conditioned by the constructions of the real and the sociocultural context and that marks the way of conceiving and exercising sexuality.

We can see that these four points, allow us.

Undoubtedly, an evolution of social thought is needed to see changes in body experience, strengthening and promotion of feminism is required as a source of libertarian resources. Defend sexual and reproductive health begins by removing barriers and limitations in access to information. To the extent that speeches are extended in sexuality where they tend to develop branches of integral sexual education, we will achieve a transformation in the mental and social representation of all people.

Bibliography

• Aguirre Sandoval, and. A. (2006). Sex, sexuality, gender and eroticism. Puebla: University Autonomy.
• Barrios, d. (2010). Legislative Assembly of the Federal District V Legislature, parliamentary stenography. Forum ‘In defense of the lay state’. Conference of the First Year of Exercise of the DIP. Alejandro Sánchez Camacho, (pages. 12-18). Mexico
• National Commission for Human Rights. (Date of consultation September 4, 2019). CNDH. Obtained from https: // www.CNDH.org.mx/sites/all/doc/cards/2015-2016/49-d-sexual.PDF
• Díaz Vega, L. B., & Rivera Mena, to. (2008). Thesis social and practical representations of the sexuality of a group of young people from the canton of Esparza. San José: University of Costa Rica headquarters of the West.
• Giraldo Neira, or. (1981). Exploring human sexualities: psychosocial aspects, Mexico: Trillas.
• INEGI. (2010). Percentage structure of the population that professes some religion by type of religion. Retrieved on September 2, 2019, from https: // www.INEGI.org.mx/themes/religion/
• Moral-de la blonde, José (2010). Religion, meanings and attitudes towards sexuality: a psychosocial approach. Colombian Magazine of Psychology, 19 (1). [Date of consultation September 3, 2019]. ISSN: 0121-5469. Available at: http: // www.Redalyc.org/article.OA?ID = 804/80415077005
• Moscovici, s. (1985). Social Psychology, II. Social Psychology and Social Psychology Life and Social Problems. Barcelona, Spain: Paidós Ibérica.
• Calixto child, and. (November 2011). “Educational model in adolescent sexuality: community psychosocial intervention’. Mexico City.
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2006). Defining Sexual Health Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health. SEPTEMBER 2019. Geneva: WHO
• Rubio, e. A. (1994). Introduction to the study of human sexuality. In anthology of human sexuality (p. 17). Mexico: Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
• Wilhelm Reich. The sexual revolution. Editorial Planeta de Agostini, 1985. ISBN 84-395-0006-8. p. V and 78.