Significant Variables Of Child Sexual Abuse

Significant variables of child sexual abuse

The results of the study threw significant variables, showing, for example, that the degree of vulnerability and risk to child sexual abuse in 2015 was high risk with a percentage of 81.3% against the results obtained later after the realization of workshops, talks to the population, achieving a representative decrease in 2015 and for 2018 of 100% risk free of risk. In the same way Berlinerblau (2017) mentions that starting to speak to minors of themes about sexuality at an early age has a positive appreciation and greater favorable results will be obtained where it will be notably decreased risk to child sexual abuse, whatthat can be evidenced in the results of this investigation.

On the other hand, mainly alarming results were obtained where in their first application the children were at a high risk of 81.1%, which for their second and third application in 2018 and those evaluated were in low and medium risks, for Barredo(2015) In their research I find that 72% of children between 1 and 15 have suffered from child sexual abuse and say that 64% know the aggressor because they are belonging to the family or is some acquaintance and that the other 8% flatly ignores the aggressor, in addition that abused children belong to a group of families that are in extreme poverty and family overcrowding.

Through the evaluations we carry out during 2015 and 2018, it was found that there are multiple environments in which children are put at risk such as family, social and educational context, finding as results that in the family context in 2015 before The workshops 59.

5% were at high risk, in the social context 62.2% and in the educational context 73.0%, Apraez (2015) says that there is a complex amount of events or situations between those, the place or Context where the child is located as is the social, family and environmental environment that puts the danger of children to the perpetuation of said scourge, likewise Gómez, Cifuentes and Sieverson (2010) in their investigation of characterization of characterization of Boys and girls treated on child sexual abuse, through 100 records or medical records found that 76 girls and 24 boys between 8 and 12 years were abused in the family environment by a male figure that was close to the child who in addition That of that physically and emotionally assaulted the abused, in the same way Brav In boys, presenting mostly in the family context through physical contact and occurs in urban areas, throwing 54% from 6 to 9 years, 54% from 10 to 14 years, where 51% are girls and 49% are boys , presenting greater risk between 10 and 12 years although it does not differ much from those of 6 and 9.

In the same way Cortes and Silva (2013) found that 17.9% of their evaluated were victims of sexual abuse, where 22.3% were women and 6.1% were men and that in addition to that 75%It presents psychological traumas, in our research it was found that for a first application in 2015 before the educational workshops on sexuality the girls were at 48.6% high risk and boys in 51.4%, whichFor their second and third application after the workshops they showed a low risk to sexual abuse, and that Batista, Vega and Camaño (2013) claim that the prevalence of sexual abuse between the ages of 14 and 16 was 32% and that53% were women and 26% men demonstrating that most of those evaluated during the time of the events were in irrigation or disadvantage of being sexually abused.

Taking into account Martinez, Rivero, Villa and Brav6%), that in boys and girls of status 4 and 5 (5.6%). Where status under boys and girls have greater degree of vulnerability, in the same way a greater vulnerability to sexual abuse in the status 1 and 2 in boys and girls corresponding to age of 6 to 9 years both boys and girls are framed.. The results of both investigations clearly show that features could be found in the face of child vulnerability to sexual abuse as found in the present research being 48.6% for female sex and 51.4% for male sex andstipulated ages, demonstrating that they are at risk in multiple contexts either family, school and social and that both boys and girls present the same risk of being sexually abused regardless of the circumstances present. In addition to that Gonzaga (2015) affirms a prevalence of thus 5.6%, that is to say that 1 in 6 boys are at risk of being sexually abused which is equivalent to 12 girls for each boy is sexually abused, comparedOur research showed that the male sex for 2015 before the workshops counted 51.4% at risk unlike female sex with a discovery of 48.6% which implies that children were more likely to beat risk of being sexually abused.

The results of the study showed that in each of the contexts already mentioned the children were at a risk of vulnerability which after applying the intervention workshops the children showed a level of satisfactory improvement, however to clarify in the contextFamiliar in 2015 in the first application the children were at a high risk of 59.5%, while for 2015 in their second application after workshops and in 2018, the evaluated ones showed a low level due to the risk of abusesexual, in the same line Romero et la. (2008) In their results they found that 20.5% of those evaluated were sexually assaulted by someone close to the family and 64.29% by a relative, which led these children to leave their homes and in many cases They initiated their sexual life between the age of 8 and 11, in addition to had suicidal ideas, in the same way Orjuela and Rodríguez (2012) through the Save The Children resulted in Spain there are 44.17% of infants abused in the family and that present crimes related to child pornography and their distribution arresting more than 1200 people, in addition to 27.96% of aggressions towards children, continuing with Cerón, Roa, Salcedo (2017), it was obtained as a result that the victims of the victims 77% were women and 23% men, who are in ages from 2 years old, to 16 years, calculating that 100% of the abused were students and the acts were committed by aggressors where 93.0% was made by acquaintances by acquaintances , of which 42.9% were relatives.

We found Lopez, Kerman, Pavia (2009) who found that 52 evaluated 36 have sexual abuse, where 84.6% are female and 25.4% of the male sex in ages between 1 and 20 years, presenting a47% in an environment outside the family and 52.8% domestic

According to Bravo, Herazo, et la. (2020) evidenced that they have a high risk of abuse in the family context of 18.2%, in the school context 25%and in the social context 18.2%, compared to the present investigation whose first results in the2015 were alarming, in the family context there was 59.5% at high risk, in the school context 73.0% and in the social context 62.2% which changed after the application of the educational workshops onSexuality by throwing for 2015 in its second application and in 2018 at a low risk, so it can be said that the desired results were obtained after being intervened.

10. CONCLUSION.

From the results obtained, it can be concluded that after the implementation of the risk prevention workshops of sexual abuse, this decreased by 84.8% as regards the general population. Detailing the variables that were taken into account for the evaluation and effective64.4%, thus going from having an average risk of 81% to obtain a risk of 16.7%.

On the other hand, according to the risk of thus evaluated by sex it is shown that by 2018, the low risk of vulnerability to an event of child sexual abuse in the female sex was increased by 15.3% going from having a low riskof 33% in 2015, to 48% for 2018;while in the male sex it increased by just 1.4%, going from having a low risk of thus in 2015 of 50% at a low risk in 2018 of 51%. Which would show that girls remain potential victims for sexual crimes being more vulnerable to them by 3% above boys, taking into account that the low risk level could not be assumed as a null or non -existent risk.

Regarding the educational context, it was observed that the workshops implemented for the prevention of sexual abuse decreased the risks by 82.1% for the general population, while in the characterization by sex it is shown that the risk decreased by a 2.8% for both sexes, increasing low risk to 48.6% and 51.4% for female and male sexes respectively in 2018. However, in what corresponds to the social context, the results show that the presence of some type of risk (half-low) of being a victim of this is supported for both 2015 (2nd application) and for 2018;However, it should be noted that the average risk for 2018 decreased by 4.4%.

Thus, it could be concluded that the elaboration and implementation of workshops that prevent child sexual abuse should not only focus on the family nucleus, but to the same extent must have an impact at the social level. It is also recommended that the workshops be prepared taking into account a differential gender approach, so that it allows to better adapt to the needs of each population.