Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

Ancient Rome Debate Response

0 / 5. 0

Words: 825

Pages: 3

59

Models of Persuasion
Ethos does not form the valid basis for the accusation. These sentiments emanate from the considerations that; an outward regard of the characteristic of a person may give the wrong perspective. It is essential that proofs have a basis on much more concise elements other than the nature of a person to achieve accuracy. To some extents, logos hold some conviction in a sense that; consideration of reasoning, analysis and argument of the accused in their language may give a hint to facts. Reasoning, argument, and analysis in the language of the accused come from their conscience.
However, there is the loophole of oratory of an individual who may form some good arguments which, however, do not hold the facts. Pathos is not a right way of getting proofs as there is a dependency on the emotions of the audience as provoked by the speaker. The weakness lies in the ability of a speaker to arouse high emotions in the audience, even when there happens to be no sound basis for the same. A person may have the capacity to arouse significant emotions in a crowd while they are not providing active elements. There could also be other factors provoking the emotions of the audience, such as the dressing or the physical appearance.
The six parts of speech
Exordium provides the opportunity for introducing the subject of discussion or talk. It also enables the presenter to capture the attention of the listeners through various means. There have to be deliberate efforts of attracting the attention of the listeners.

Wait! Ancient Rome Debate Response paper is just an example!

The narratio part of the speech offers the background information on the subject of talk. This part of expression makes the audience aware of the important aspects concerning the topic. Divisio forms the part of speech whereby; the narrator divides the case of presentation into various segments. The narrator also makes clear each of the components of addressing in the narration. Confirmatio: here there is the inclusion of the points for substantiating each of the elements presented in the speech. There is building up of the facts and details.
Refutatio: here; the presenter has the opportunity of presenting the refutation or counter arguments to the points given. There is the creation of viable alternative points which may be opposing to the earlier submitted cases. Conclusio forms the final part of speech whereby; the narrator sums up all the points given in the argument and pushes the listener to act or think in a way that is compatible with the ideas presented.
Specific rhetorical devices
Analogy: this notion is an example of a particular rhetorical device. It entails the comparison of two things that have similar characteristics. For instance, one could say that a person was walking slowly like a snail. There is a general knowledge that a snail saunters. Giving an analogy of the snail as the presentation of how the person was walking gives the audience the opportunity to figure out that the individual must have been walking extremely slowly. An analogy is in usage with the aim of putting a particular point across. For example in the example given, the point could be the elaboration of the extent of the sickness or hunger of the person in question.
A metaphor is another specific rhetorical device. This notion entails the comparison of two elements by saying that one is the other by possessing the characteristics of that other. For instance, a man who appears to be unyielding could be said to be a lion. When giving the picture of a person who is innocent, rhetoric could simply say that so and so is a child.
Aspect of performance/delivery
The gesture is an essential part of performance/delivery. It entails the use of body movements in an effort of making a point across. For example, there could be a demonstration of how a person or an animal walking, either slowly or fast. The display of the walking could also be majestic or feeble. For a narrator to attain the right kind of gesturing there ought to be the correct matching of the gestures with the item of discussion. For example, it would be wrong to demonstrate walking when a narrator is talking about sitting down. There also ought to be the precise articulation of oneself so that; every audience can see the gesture. It might be of help to consider reduction of words when one starts to demonstrate so that there can be maximum concentration on the gesturing.
For the gestures in performance to come out apparently, there ought to be the right grooming and attire. Being in the right grooming and attire makes the gesture to be relevant to the issue of discussion and get much emphasis from the dressing. It is essential that there is the incorporation of the culture of the audience in the audience because; different gestures have different meanings in different cultures. Every gesture in the presentation, including the movement from one point to the other, must be in alignment with putting across a certain point.

Get quality help now

Top Writer

Arnold Foster

5.0 (218 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

Thanks for the awesome essay! I’ve got an A-grade, and my teacher said it was the best paper in the class! I would definitely use your services again if I need help with my homework.

View profile

Related Essays