Argue against police body cameras. Advantages and disadvantages. Choose side to argue.

Police Body Camera
Name
Institutional Affiliation
Police Body Camera
Perkins, G. (2017). Lights, Camera, Action! Body-worn Cameras: Challenges and Opportunities in Police Research. Policing: A Journal Of Policy And Practice. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/police/pax002
The main argument is on the benefits that come about with police utilizing the body cameras. The issue of body cameras has begun to gain momentum in the current society. The police are the ones who were employed to come up with the result. Quantitative research was the method that was used during the study and it proved to be very successful. They issued out questionnaires which were answered then assessed for purposes of coming up with the results. The results of the study were that the body cameras help in providing evidence during a case involving domestic violence. In most cases, domestic violence usually happens at home and in case there is no proof of physical injuries it becomes hard for the victim to prove. The camera allows them to see the victim’s injuries, demeanor together with the reactions that the person took place during the event. The additional research required is at what time is the camera taking the footage. Once the camera is reviewed later then the police officers can be able to see what transpired during the time of the assault.
The author provided a persuasive argument because he was able to give an advantage to the police body camera. The article is relevant as it talks about why the public should support the police body cameras and make their lives safe.

The finding helps in reducing criminal offenses as the victims of the domestic violence can now get justice. Most victims fear to seek justice simply because they may lack some evidence, but with the introduction of the cameras, most of these cases will be very simple as there will be evidence. The author is an authority on the subject because he is part of the force. The source will help me argue about the advantages of police body camera.
Phillips, S. (2016). Eyes are not Cameras: The Importance of Integrating Perceptual Distortions, Misinformation, and False Memories into the Police Body Camera Debate. Policing, paw008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/police/paw008
The main argument on this source is how officers handle potentially controversial circumstances. That has been a significant challenge for many years as some police officers have been accused of taking sides when dealing with sensitive cases. Some law enforcement expertise were the ones who were we used to help in drawing the solutions to the argument. Qualitative research was the one that was utilized for this event. The result of the study showed that there had been improved behaviors among the people since the issues of police body cameras were introduced. No individual wants to be caught on the camera doing funny things that can be punishable by the law. People always tend to behave well when they realized that there is someone who is checking on them. Without the availability of police cameras, there would be so many criminal activities in the streets as the criminals know that no one is watching them.
The author provided a persuasive argument as he is able to tell us how the officers have improved the situation as they can handle. The article is relevant because it describes us how the body camera has made the public to behavior. The finding is useful for criminal offenses as the public has improved their behavior. The author is an authority on the subject because this article is for supporting educational programs. The source will help me in providing evidence when discussing the advantages of police body camera. According to the author, a majority of the people support any security measure put in place to ensure that everyone is safe.
Young, J., & Ready, J. (2016). A Longitudinal Analysis of the Relationship between Administrative Policy, Technological Preferences, and Body-Worn Camera Activation among Police Officers. Policing, paw005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/police/paw005The main argument is how the body cameras are likely to help the police officers. The public was the studied for this research. Qualitative research was the one that was used for this work. The audience was observed thus acquiring the results. Seventy percent of the public interviewed supported the move to install the cameras everywhere. However, twenty percentages were against the police cameras since they invaded one’s privacy. Ten percent of the sample was not sure. It was noted that there was a reduction in complaints and related expenses from the public as compared to the past. In the past, most people used to complain as there were a lot of criminal activities going on, but all this reduced with the introduction of police cameras.
The article is persuasive as it tells us how the cameras have helped the police officers by making their work easier. The source is useful to my research as it projects how the public has reacted to the issue of police body cameras as most of the people were supporting the move. The cost of conducting criminal events have been reduced there is a reduction in complaints and related expenses. The author has authority over the issue because he is a specialist in police psychology, therefore; he is talking out of an experience. Therefore, he has to assess anything that is being introduced into the police force. The source will help me argue out on the advantages of police using their body cameras. Lastly, due to increase in insecurity, police cameras are very important as far as our security is concerned.