Cause and Effect Argument Essay Assignment

Is There Need To Legalize The Sale Of Human Organs?
Name
Institution
Is There Need To Legalize The Sale Of Human Organs?
Currently, there are calls across the world for consideration of the merits associated with the market where the sale of human organs is legalized. A discussion on the need a have people make sales of the organs would enable for a well-informed decision in this matter that is of both moral and medical value.
As it stands, thousands of people are at risk losing their lives before finding an appropriate donor. Several people are ever on the list waiting for transplant activity while a good number of them also lose their lives annually before accessing the organ (Cohen, 2012). On the same note, the figures keep on rising yearly by a figure close to ten percent. However, there are major concerns with the introduction of payments for those persons who are willing to donate their organs. The concern here is that the move would lead to poor and vulnerability of these persons due to pressure in solving their financial turmoil through a sale of their body parts or organs in this case.
Indeed a market for the sale of human organs that is also properly regulated needs to be allowed so that irregular sale of organs if not faced out at least would decrease dramatically. In fact, the effects that associate with the black among the patients are so desperate in having the transplant operation such that they end up making trips abroad in search of the organs (Cohen, 2012).

Transplant tourism as it may be called in many circumstances leads to unsuccessful operations that need extra surgery operations when the patient returns to his or her native homeland. In this case, it would be sensible for the allowance of a sale of organs though under strict regulation. Under regulations, the move will curb the transplant of organs with infections with deadly diseases such as HIV and many others.
The debate to allow for the sale of organs has been long overdue. The move is within the morality demands. Also, the time is ripe enough to give this instance a consideration since it remains an eternal shame in the world that has fully made it not possible to possible to find organs easily due to the illegality placed on their sales (Harrison, 2005). As already said earlier, many people end up losing their lives every year because of the failure to have the organs they need for the transplant. In this regard, it for sure gives a confirmation of the manner by which this problem is of great urgency (Harrison, 2005). When one gets payment for the organ transplant, it does not necessarily mean that there is the nullification of altruism. The instance is because doctors are less concerned since they receive their payment as usual while not from the payment got from the sale of these organs.
What is so sad to note that, the system of late pays each and every person with the exception of the donor. In consequence, the researchers in the field of medicine are coming up with proposals defining an ethical market in organs whereby the donors would receive payment as systems’ part of regulation (Harrison, 2005). In such a system, there will be a strict control of defined community so that there would be accountability for every organ sold. There will be no importations. Each and every health system in a state would be the only supplier and the distributor of the organs the same way it does on other treatments (Harrison, 2005); that is financial capability from an individual on being paid for his or her organ would not be an issue. On the same note, there would be a requirement for consent for each donation and at the same time will have to undergo rigorous checks with the goal of ensuring that no any donor goes through unnecessary pressure.
The transplantation has great shortages of organs. There is the need to review so much concerning legalizing the sale of human organs. The latest advancement in medicine technology and its related services indeed make it today justifiable (Kishore, 2005) in permitting for a market for kidney and also for the sale of liver organs as many other parts of the body appearing to be so risky. In any case, an individual has the intention of alleviating or solving his or her financial debacles, he or she is indeed right in making a sale of his organ. The choice here rests with him or her on this matter.
The cost of carrying off body organs is indeed very expensive that it even equates the performance either one or two dialyzes (Kishore, 2005). For example, one kidney goes at an average price of $60,000 to $120, 0000. The act of donating kidney has as at present become so safe that in this case becomes ethically justifiable and in this case it serves as the best option for preventing all incidences of illegal trafficking of human organs.
Elsewhere, there is a strong opposition against the act of liberalization of organ market. According to these opponents, there is the need for a public forum that debates on the merits and demerits of a market that allows for the sale of human organs (Surman, Saidi & Burke, 2008). However, many sitting governments are for this view though are ready for debating on it with the evolution of both the theoretical and empirical cases of literature. Yes, there are pros and cons in the legalization of the sale of human organs (Snyder, 2007). What is essential is the requirement for a big change in the opinion that comes from the public and legislation altogether. Another argument that does not support the regulated market is that when a person pays some people, what are the likely impacts of the currently existing donor programs and the already living donor programs?
Over the last couple of years, there has been an episode that seen a steady rise in the donations specifically on living cases of donors that have of late surpassed the deceased donors in their number (Surman, Saidi & Burke, 2008). In a country such as England for example, close to 1100 live donations were existing in last year in comparison to also close to 1,000 dead patients. At an average of three organs from every donor, the surgeons managed to perform close to 3800 transplants in the previous year alone (Kishore, 2005). However, the fear is that the introduction of legalized sale of organs will result into many paid donors getting into the business against those who wish to donate free of payment; voluntary donors.
Another group of opponents to the established of a legalized market for the sale of human organs admit that the move will result in the conflicts of fundamental ethical barriers. While the same conflicts will emanate, according to them, there will be very little radical measures that may be given top priorities about the matter (Snyder, 2007). It is not essential to have the act of commercialization of parts of human bodies. On the same note, the disadvantaged persons in the society will find themselves making sales of the body parts willingly minus giving considerations to the possible risks linked to the act (Kishore, 2005). For this reason, legalization of this matter will result in a lot of risks to the affected parties.
The merits associated with the compensation to people who provide cells such as bone marrow where the body serves as the replacement and also involves the safe mode of extraction may far reaching. In other aspects, the instance here is a policy experiment that may emerge out to be groundbreaking (Kishore, 2005). In the event of compensating donors through aphaeresis and more people beginning to receive stem-cell transplants, in this case, may lead to a consideration of this type of donation. Yes, international trade on organs is currently taking place. Web sites that enable people to reach donors for kidneys have to travel to developing nations for the purpose of obtaining transplants. There is no compensation at this juncture, but it is not easy to undertake the regulation of such kind of exchanges.
Nevertheless, the sale of organs may seem not logical as the very first step that effectively addresses agony between supply and demand. Some changes are still available that can be made on the organ donation policy that may lead to improvement on giving rates (Harrison, 2005). A country such as Spain for example, the citizens are organ donors by default while those who are not willing to participate in the same have no option but to opt out of the same. On the other hand, in the US, people have to voluntary give that in this case may prove to be the deterrent.
Conclusively, there is a drastic extension of the program of the organ transplant by many governments all over the world. The move here is reviving fresh hopes to several people who are in desperate need of the organs. With the desire to undertake boosts in the current programs, health facilities will have no option but to ensure the retrieval of organs from patients who succumb to deaths in cases of accidents and the emergency departments. Also, it may extend to those persons who meet their deaths in intensive care units as at present. With regards to the same, within these systems, there are systems available that can create the enticement to donors. For example, member families of donors may be accorded priority on the waiting list of organs in case they need one. In this regard, their the act of legalizing the sale of human organs for transplant should proceed to save the detriments that have so far been identified in this paper plus also reap the benefits associated with legalizing the act as discussed in this paper as well. On the same note, the move will lead to several hundreds of many organs being of reach to people thus resulting in the reduction in the waiting list.
References
Cohen, I. (2012). Can the Government Ban Organ Sale? Recent Court Challenges and the Futureof US Law on Selling Human Organs and Other Tissue. American Journal Of Transplantation, 12(8), 1983-1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04092.xHarrison, E. (2005). Stakes and Kidneys: Why Markets in Human Body Parts are Morally Imperative; Kidney for Sale by Owner: Human Organs, Transplantation, and the Market. BMJ, 331(7514), 460-460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.331.7514.460
Kishore, R. (2005). Human organs, scarcities, and sale: morality revisited. Journal Of Medical Ethics, 31(6), 362-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.009621Snyder, J. (2007). Kidney for Sale by Owner: Human Organs, Transplantation, and the Market – By Mark J. Cherry. Developing World Bioethics, 7(3), 168-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8847.2007.00161.xSurman, O., Saidi, R., & Burke, T. (2008). Regulating the sale of human organs: a discussion incontext with the global market. Current Opinion In Internal Medicine, 7(3), 267-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mci.0b013e328303e722