Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

Does Noelle have a valid claim for wrongful terminaton?

0 / 5. 0

Words: 275

Pages: 1

61

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course
Date
Does Noelle have a valid claim for wrongful termination?
Much as the actions of Noelle do not warrant his dismissal from the job position as a principal, he lacks a valid claim to sue the employer. Notably, employees at-will is a concept provided for by the American constitution and enshrined in the labour laws (Arnow 426). In fact, all states in the United States deem employment relations to be at will except in Montana. Under this law, an employee’s employment contract can be dismissed by the employer without a justifiable cause or notice. Additionally, the latter can dismiss the former for any reason provided it is not illegal as defined by the American constitution. Some of the unlawful reasons that cannot warrant job loss include employee’s religion, race, or ethnicity. Workers claiming wrongful termination have filed numerous court cases. However, after the acknowledgement that they were hired under the at-will act, courts always deny them a legal redress for losses resulting from the dismissal (Verkuil 188).
As previously noted, Noelle lacks a valid claim that he can use to justify that his termination was unlawful. The contract between the employee and the employer states clearly that either of them can terminate employment without giving the other reasons, notice, or a formal hearing. Therefore, being employed under the at-will agreement, he has nothing against the employer for firing him. The law postulates that workers and employers have the freedom of contract hence either can terminate their engagement at will.

Wait! Does Noelle have a valid claim for wrongful terminaton? paper is just an example!

Interestingly, although his actions of stopping kitchen staff from stamping students hands appear wise, the terms and conditions of his engagement act do not protect him against unjust dismissal. Again, he cannot justify the termination was discriminatory. What is more, at-will engagement means that an employer can change the terms such as terminating benefits and reducing paid time off without issuing an employee a notice (Verkuil 189). In this context, no matter how justified Noelle was in his administrative duties, the administrator acted in accordance with provisions of the contract.

Works Cited
Arnow-Richman, Rachel. “Modifying At-Will Employment Contracts.” BCL Rev. 57 (2016): 427.
Verkuil, Paul R. “Deprofessionalizing State Governments: The Rise of Public At-Will Employment.” Public Administration Review 75.2 (2015): 188-189.

Get quality help now

Jennie Phelps

5,0 (495 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

High-quality writing and plagiarism check. Timely delivery. Nothing to worry about. 5 stars out of 5!

View profile

Related Essays

Recism and Health

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Cyberattack Brief

Pages: 1

(275 words)

THe US trade dificit

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Politics in our daily lives

Pages: 1

(275 words)

History Islam Text 2

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Bishop Stanley B Searcy Sr

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Phar-Mor

Pages: 1

(550 words)