Euthanasia Is A Practice That Largely Involves The Medical Field And Society

Euthanasia is a practice that largely involves the medical field and society

Scientific advances have contributed significant changes to medicine and all aspects related to this area, allowing to cure diseases that were considered practically incurable for several years, but these diseases have mutated and acquiring greater affectation in the people of the world population causing degenerative diseases, tumor and of course cancer, unfortunately using euthanasia that is a term that is partially or almost completely unknown by people today, one of the reasons is for the various derivations it presents and the only ones that areThey come to link with this term are those that are related or part of the medical area. Now, euthanasia emphasizes premeditated the baby of a person who is on the verge of agony due to some disease. Likewise, it is necessary to highlight the importance and role that the doctor plays, since it is a fact that the doctor performs with or without the consent of the patient or any member of his family bond in his charge;Testing the inoperance and lack of professional ethics of doctors in the face of these types of problems. On the other hand, this issue also based on its implications such as social aspects, since it is not an individual decision, but rather collective, where the patient not only participates, but also the protagonists with whom they are related that they are doctors, nurses, relatives among others.

In the previous one, euthanasia is a practice that develops in the medical field, so that certain confusion with the types and the purpose of each one can be generated, where it is of great relevance to distinguish its meanings, first is the direct euthanasiawhich is “the process of advancing the death of a person who has an incurable disease.

”(El Mundo, 2019), that is, the doctor gives the ease of death of a patient by providing lethal drugs that end with his life and/or the elimination of medications that are indispensable for their treatment, known as active and passive euthanasia respectively respectively. On the other hand, indirect euthanasia consists in relief. However, one of the points of view that should be taken into account is the individual or patient, because this is how it is of this practice of which it will be part of other people, somehow they are still called as a homicideWith certain certain features.  It is worth mentioning that this practice is not related, nor does it follow a parallel line with the assisted suicide, since the execution of the latter is directly provided by the same patient. Consequently, some countries of the world legalize this praxis of euthanasia actively, since government leaders think they are appealing to a benefit for the patient by granting decent death being the opposite, however, the rest of the countries inThe world considers this action as a fracturing and breaking of universal law to a full life and everything that this implies, which is corroborated in the following quotation “arbitrary deprivation of life is not limited to the illicit act of homicide;It extends to the deprivation of the right to live with dignity.”(Trindade, 2018), then no law or incongruous norm created can be protected through some chronic or irremediable disease as a condition to decide whether or not an individual is attentive or not with life for their medical situation. 

Similarly, the role that the doctor develops in a professional, ethical and moral manner must be taken into account before this problem that is of great transcendence, since, when entering a hospital, all the confidence is deposited to the doctor in charge of them by activating them.A medical-patient relationship, where the main interest of doctors is to protect and ensure the health of a patient, where there is no logical sense of an intentional death perpetrated by a doctor, since euthanasia in medicine meant the dehumanization of dehumanization of the dehumanization ofthe same. In such a way that medicine will be hindered by fruitful progress capable of overcoming any negative prognosis. Being how doctors will lose credibility in this area, becoming imperturbable to any serious condition such as terminal cancer, malformations of all kinds and cerebral degeneration, where its disability and inability will be exposed in medical science for being a participant and executor of euthanasia. However, several groups of doctors appeal for the suicide assisted in a consensual manner by the patient when he really feels the only option of relief this practice in order to avoid prolonged and useless agony in the last moments of their existence that is ratified bymeans of the following appointment “He who legalizes euthanasia and assisted suicide does not force anyone;It will only allow people who wish to be recognized and respect their rights.”(Mata, 2018). Similarly, society can be affected by death without pain, that is, euthanasia, since, not only does it surround personally, or privately, but rather it must be a debate of the whole society, not only of doctors. People are the only ones responsible and capable of deciding on their lives and how they want to live it until their last instances. Likewise, society is a key factor of a country, and is the power to demand what are the needs it requires, supporting the most vulnerable groups, in this case the sick, given that a person would be valued with a person with aillness for what he can and is able to do and not for his being of human quality, that is, what he represents for life.

In summary, the euthanasia topic is an aspect that is mediated in the corners of a hospital and the society in some way or another is excluded either directly or indirectly, ignoring this part of the scope of medicine. Where it is necessary to publicize and inform in a generalized way to the citizen community that consists of this praxis and with what objective is pursued, since all individuals in a community must be aware of the risks and difficulties that can be raised when someone suffersA disease that can end his life, and that is when the role of the doctor who has to perform in favor of health and of course the life of the patient is involved, this being questioned many times for the decisions they make. For this reason, it is very important to pay more attention to the needs of people with respect to medicine, because, by committing the act of euthanasia, their rights they receive since they are born since they are born are being violated. It is worth mentioning that human life is a collection of society, social and ethical challenges are interconnected with death without pain, forcing to proclaim a care towards the life of one and others.