Gender Roles In Society

Gender roles in society

Introduction

Gender roles in different contexts have caused the subordination of both sexes before society. The main transmitters of stereotypes have been given in the most direct contexts of a person, such as school, family, church. Therefore, the lack of sexual education has caused confusion and even bad decisions in people, due to the patriarchal model in which we have lived for several generations and although it has been a long time, there are still retrograde thoughts in people in people. That is why the author mentions that: As we have seen, the model was predominated at first was that of the subordination of the sexes.

Developing

In which the patriarchy not only had the social power, but had developed political, economic and even biological power, which was the dimension that determined the roles within society obtaining as a result a dependency of women towards men. The subordination of genres comes from many years ago, bringing with it a lot. One of the largest factors towards gender subordination has been the domain of gender roles in the family.

Due to a society that makes us normalize the reality in which we live thus generating difficulties in training people’s personality. Thus, the authors mention that it has been proven that gender stereotypes causes limitation and confusion in children, since we live in a society without sexual equity, because there are established roles, since from the gestation of the baby andThey are assigning colors according to their sex.

That is why they must explain to their children the inequality that exists so that they can fight this society with damages.

Therefore, gender roles come from antiquity, thus causing limitations in people’s personality, as if they can express themselves and be as they like, without their gender being part of their choice. The school is one of the transmitters of stereotypes, although it is one of the most important contexts in the formation of children, it is relaxed in some programs or activities within the educational center unconsciously. That is why Zapata and Ruz reaffirm that: school is an elementary factor in the life of a person, it is one of the main trainers from childhood and what allows to socialize with the peers, acquiring a management for the social development of each person.

Therefore, educational centers are the first that should encourage equality in all aspects, without assigning colors or adjectives, so that students are clear that we all deserve the same treatment for the simple fact of being people, thanThere are no differentiated treatment by sex, because we are all equal. Before this situation the Minedu had an initiative to present a proposal about the gender approach in schools, being a totally new proposal in the educational field, but not all people agreed. That is why the author mentions that there are people who wanted to spoil the new reform imposed by the Minedu.

In which he wanted to guide the gender approach and its importance. However, through different groups campaigns were made, in which false information about this approach was disclosed and even managed to confuse teachers on this subject. So many of them have believed that this new reform sought to foster homosexuality in children, and that is why some were disagreements. In addition, I continue the confusion between gender, sex and sexuality;reason why some teachers prefer not to talk about the subject in classes. Therefore, people should be informed properly, reading different positions.

Seeing information from different media, so that in that way I can obtain a forceful position, since as the author mentions in the previous appointa confusion was generated between what consisted and what people had interpreted, generating that this project is not executed. There are currently many retrograde thoughts in people, that is why talking about sexuality remains a taboo in any context, especially in parents. Given this situation, the author argues that:

These forms refer mainly to the fear that fathers and mothers take badly to talk about sexuality in classrooms, and generate some kind of professional inconvenience;Therefore, the issues must be embroidered with caution. Thus, we must bear in mind that communication with parents in a assertive and clear way of the events that happens within our society is one of the most important tools for a person not to be carried out by the stereotypes that impose them but byHis ideals, so he really wants to be. Likewise, the media being one of the most influential for society.

They have also promoted stereotypes and although they mostly do it indirectly when a person analyzes it in detail can realize that in large part of the content, stereotypes of how a woman or a man before society should be, generating limitations inthe personality. That is why the authors support that the media are currently considered one of the transmitters of ideologies, which consciously or unconsciously this has been reflected in the material they transmit. Through the format of the television characters.

conclusion

Children are being taught an equally elementary confrontation, focused on inequality, both verbal and physical violence. Therefore, it has been proven that television violence increases aggressive behaviors. (Zapata and Ruz.) For that reason, people normalize these actions making them part of our life and thus carrying it from generation to generation, being a model of what we have to be according to our gender and the only way to be able to remove these thoughts, is to educate the newgeneration with much more defined values such as equal and respect for others always.