Google and Result Search revised

Google and Result Search
Name
Institution

Do you think Google should be responsible for modifying its search results in response to individual request? If so, what criteria should it use in doing so? Are there limits to the resources the company should be expected to expend to comply with such requests?
Google is a business company that should be responsible for modifying its search results because in most cases human error in submitting their documents and important research works, the need for the edition is paramount. Additionally, most outcome dooms individual reputation and may portray an ill-feted image of the person in search. In doing so, the company should provide a procedural criterion should be applied to fasten the process. For example, the request should be linked to immediate customer care who works daily. As a business premise, the customer care should be adversely connected to the technical team and the copyright team who will ensure the request is handled with the best agency possible (Jones & Jones, 2013). Google should provide to its users a link where they can interact with their head office. They should hasten the request urgencies in order to reduce further credit loss.
The company should have a well outlined flow of information from the head office to the lowest officer. This eases the amount of time taken to process the action. Google control laws and policies should be amended to safeguard the rights of both the users and the officials. The company should provide content limits to give copyright companies a backup before deletions are done (Gruber, Saddler, Cheyer, Kittlaus, Brigham, Giuli & Bastea-Forte, 2015).

Similarly, there should be a share on the resource’s exposition between the publisher and the Google Company. The whole procedure should not be left to the publisher. In every situation, a well stipulated constitution with all codes of conducts and rules should be designed to protect the rights of both the user and the officers in ensuring their actions are credible.
In conclusion, because all business companies are profit-oriented; request evaluation must be as fast as possible to build customers trust, to save on the financial expenses, and adhere to the government rules and regulations on business firms. All the applied rules should spread to all countries but manage centrally.

Reference
Gruber, T. R., Saddler, H. J., Cheyer, A. J., Kittlaus, D., Brigham, C. D., Giuli, R. D., … & Bastea-Forte, M. (2015). U.S. Patent No. 8,930,191. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Jones, G. R. (2013). Organizational theory, design, and change. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.