Jack Ernest, decision making, the Graceland Memorial hospital. Questions

Question 1
Jack Ernest in the case “nowhere job” has been assigned the role of developing an operational structure for a new insurance product. His work environment is as challenging and full of obstacles. The rational decision making requires one to apply a stepwise technique through the establishment of criteria in taking the right choice among alternatives. Jack is therefore expected to be logical, analyze the current situation and objectivity in making the decision of quitting his “nowhere job.” In his career, he faces challenges that hinder his performance of duties. For instance, he lacks formal job description and his efforts to get one, bears no fruits. He is isolated from the company’s operations, needs and significant changes regarding the objectives. Further, Jack faces conflict with the management and the new outside consultant over whom to report. The lack of proper communication and attention to his questions and proposals hinders him from performing his duties. Jack should, therefore, analyze his ability to successfully deliver better output and achieve his goals in such a situation. The analysis would comprise of checking into other ways of completing his assignments within the same conditions. Also, the report should present him with information of any anticipation in changes in the working conditions. He would, therefore, decide whether to quit or continue working.
Question 2
Decision making is a crucial aspect for every individual whether in a managerial position or low-rank positions.

The approaches employed by decision makers in an organization determine the impacts created for any choice made. The valid alternative chosen should be useful in solving a problem and resolution of conflicts. Mr. Hank should, therefore, pick a style that facilitates active participation of all the stakeholders in the health facility. He should, therefore, adopt a participatory approach to resolving the conflicts at the southern regional hospital. The best solution would be gained through the willingness of the health center staff to participate. The conflict at southern regional hospital arises as a result of differences in the race among the staff and the patients within the geographic region. It can, therefore, be resolved when all the stakeholders are actively involved in the making of the right choice. Mr. Hank identifies information causing the rise of such problems, and with the recommendation and views of all the staff, he will be able to generate alternatives in which the best will be chosen and implemented wholly.
Question 3
The Graceland Memorial hospital is required to comply with the new regulation requirements with urgency to avoid fines and hazardous risks posed to the worker’s health. For proper compliance, the management had to update its rules within the facility and avoid penalties charged. All the relevant identities agreed on Mr. Priesthood suggestion except for Ms. Thompson who objected the idea saying that it was too expensive yet unworthy. Also, she pointed out that other hospital had not yet adopted the new regulations. In this case, the collaborating approach would be useful in resolving the conflict. Since the outcome of the choice made affects each person in the facility, every individual’s opinion needs to be evaluated to facilitate a win-win outcome. Also, the decision should create a level of commitment to everybody as all the department will be involved in implementation. Moreover, this case highlights making decisions of high importance as the hospital strives to maintain its leading position. The availability of expertise at Graceland Memorial Hospital also facilitates the efficient use of collaborating approach in resolving the conflict.