Noam Chomsky, Relationship Between Morphology And Syntax

Noam Chomsky, relationship between morphology and syntax

The "morphology and syntax" disciplines have been the basis to implement various investigations, with the end of today to have evidence of the implications generated by the same. Which have generated approaches to two totally opposite ideas;The first postulates its separation, however the second seeks the interrelation of both disciplines. In the latter, it is where emphasis will be placed on the following exhibition essay addressing aspects such as: its conceptualizations, brief explanation about its unification process. Likewise, other extremely important elements from the generative semantics specifically: prayer, syntactic component, interpretive models, deep and superficial structure. Taking into account that all arise thanks to the studies proposed by the great linguist Noam Chomsky, where the relationship of these disciplines can be analyzed and interpreted more abundantly.

Before offering general aspects of the theme, it is essential to emphasize that the expression morphology refers to that discipline that deals with making known how the words are structured. Also, their respective classification, that is, the noun, verb, adjective, articles, pronouns, adverbs and conjunctions, giving it a function within the sentences. Meanwhile, that the syntax refers to the study of the forms presented by the words in the prayers. In that same order, the Hispanic morphosintaxis document, morphology studies the syntax of the word through lexical formation rules, making it clear that you cannot choose to separate them, because one depends on the other to accurately determine all the aspects involvedIn prayers.

Taking these conceptualizations into account, it can continue to explain that these disciplines managed to unify first with the investigations about "language syntax", then in the 70s with the study of "morphology". Emphasizing that despite these inquiries, there has not yet a definitive approach that offers responses to everything involved in morphosintaxis. However, it is demonstrated that the formal variation of words includes a functional. Thanks to these ideas, what we call morphosintaxis today, which becomes an essential part of linguistics, since it offers both the formal variations of words and their respective functions, already in the act of oral or written speech.

Continuing in that same order, the generative grammar proposed by the linguist Noam Chomsky calls the syntactic component of the sentences from which they derive: the morphosyntactic referring to all the rules established for the sentences, is also the phonological that studies the sounds of thewords and pragmatic focused on language according to the context. Without these components it would be impossible. Therefore, this discipline analyzes and interprets each element in prayer, until establishing the relationship of words with each other, from their structure.

Following the same thread, Chomsky also presents the interpretive models, where the speaker and listener play an essential role, because the meaning of the interpretations of the words depends on them. For this, an example can be established with the expressions "The bus was struck by a tire" or "give milk to the bus", the meaning of the sentences will depend completely on the speaker, also the context in which he is found. On the other hand, it proposes the deep and superficial structures, which can be better understood through the following sentence: when Carla fell to the well began to shout, it is the same as saying Carla started shouting when he fell into the well. The deep structure is the meaning of that word chain and the superficial. In this way, morphosintaxis depending on its grammatical category allows to organize words in different order without prayer losing meaning.

As expressed above, both morphology and syntax are extremely important disciplines that generate the study of the forms and functions that words in prayers play. Which went through a research process, until the unification of the term morphosintaxis, already as part of the linguistics focused on the word. Likewise, highlighting the linguist Noam Chomsky with his proposal of generative semantics, giving rise to other elements such as: syntactic components, interpretive models, deep and superficial structures.