Rawls And Smith For A Globalized Justice

Rawls and Smith for a globalized justice

 In the first part of "The idea of justice" Sen, he mentions several important authors for the subject, but first of all he sets his attention on John Rawls and Adam Smith, compares their approaches, which each one considers as a viable option to combatinjustice and make a fair society, and then combine its cavilations and reach the social interconnection that is currently lived.

Primarily it is possible to briefly describe the core of the idealization of each. The Rawlsian approach appeals with a contractualist idea of a unanimous accepted contract by all related in the original position, where he describes his theory as the intention of “generalizing and bringing a greater degree of abstraction the traditional theory as represented byLocke, Rousseau and Kant ”, also compares their design with the employment and notion of utilitarianism. This leads to the derivation of, which arise from what he calls the veil of ignorance, that is, to go to the impartiality of the people who are immersed, without some kind of differentiation due to race, sex, ethnicity, ethnicity, ethnicity, ethnicity, ethnicity,etc., so that these are not affected in a particular way or by their same community. Starting from this, the hierarchical principles are, first of all, individual freedom, of it becomes the other principle of equality that is divided into two: equal opportunities and the fight against inequality. Based on this, Rawls states that a certain level of inequality is positive, as long as the person who is in worse condition that the other has an acceptable level of dignified life.

This is based on its idea of equity, which at the same time, this rationing determines the institutions that seek from justice to form a basic structure of society, which he calls "justice as equity".

Adam Smith on the other hand concentrates on public discussion, that is, in the need to invoke wide varieties of opinions and perspectives based on the experiences that happen outside a particular cultural and social circle. It is located in the theory of moral feelings, as a requirement to examine one’s behavior "as one imagines that an impartial spectator would examine it". As an impartial spectator, Smith refers to "man inside the chest, his intellectual strategy focuses on expanding compression and developing the scope of our ethical search," that is, going beyond the reasoning that can be. In this sense, Smith admits that the opinions of other people close or far from the social circle are required to achieve the impartiality that is set openly and not closed by the interpretations of others that were linked to the interpretation.

Faced with the arguments presented, a certain similarity of objectivity approaches is evidentable, so that objectivity is linked to both directly or indirectly to the ability to avoid scrutiny in the form of points of view, ethical or political convictions thatThey affect both nearby and distant people. Hence the idea that justice has partly an obligation connection with the other that is clearly important, because if you have a concern with the other (whether close or distant) then the orbit of justice has to include these peoplein the interests of herself;It should also be included that the actions of a state justice system can influence the life and decisions of other countries;And finally, the historical experiences of other similar situations can help overcome the parish itself of the same state.