Science And Religion, Two Visions Of The World (Criticism)

Science and religion, two visions of the world (criticism)

In an epistemological basic concept with a purely empirical mink regarding the relationship between science and religion. There has always been a debate between a possible relationship between them, certifying their evidence in which, in our view, both try to explain the origin of the world including the creation of everything existing together with its operation, in addition, several writers such asAlister McGrath in his book "Science from faith" have spoken of the subject and how can there be a relationship and as one can complement another, although he has not been the only one when talking about the subject since there are scientists who refer toreligion or religious that refer to science but each one maintains its position.

How deep should faith be in the rationality of the universe and the desire to understand, weak reflection of the reason that is revealed in this world, which made a Kepler and a Newton years of lonely work to unravel the principles of mechanicsfrom the sky! (…) Only who has dedicated his life to similar purposes can have a clear idea of what inspired these men and gave them the necessary strength to remain faithful to their goal despite countless failures. It is the cosmic religious feeling that provides that force to man. A contemporary has said, with plenty of reasons, that in these materialistic times that we live the only deep religious people are serious scientific researchers.

(Einstein, 1981).

This being the critical vision of one of the most popular scientists of the S.XX. Considering as two visions contrary to the existence of the world which one tries to deny the other denying its validity, thus taking into account that today it maintains that the vision of science can be true, affecting the religious vision that causes itsSlow disappearance (Monserrat, 2010). As the title of the article says, it can be seen that science and religion are two different ways of seeing reality and in the text they try to address three different points, one of them is the epistemological, which wants us to make us understandThe origin of each of these and how they began to develop on the side of religion shows us the development of a faith from experiences, while science shows it as exposed theories and scientific laws that are subsequently developed, by the point ofSocial view (Monserrat, 2010) affirms "science and religion form two complex social systems that group individual and collective experiences and that have their norms and patterns of behaviors that result in the formation of communities with a type of structure and their own language". And the third point of view is the historical that to their own opinion could be said that it is the process that religion and science have crossed over time.

We could conclude that from the analysis that the article does and our personal opinion, different points of view are explored from those witnessed in it and positions of great scientists throughout history, finding that there is no stable relationship of them, but,That people prefer to maintain their belief in one or the other, to such a degree that by religion is more towards tradition and science for the verified argumentation position.