suffolk resolves

Name:
Instructor’s Name:
Course:
Date:
Suffolk Resolves
Parliament in 1774 passed the reformatory Coercive Acts in retaliation for the 1773 Boston Tea Party. By repudiating Massachusetts’ charter, closing down the Boston Port, and conveying military forces in and around Boston, Parliament mistakenly supposed that it would segregate and make an example of Boston, hindering further colonial opposition. However, the brutal British laws commonly referred to “Intolerable Acts” by the colonists only strengthened the imperial unity. Mobilizing to the defense of Boston, the First Continental Congress met in Philadelphia on September 5, 1774 (Schlesinger 247). The Continental Congress collectively sanctioned the Suffolk Resolves, to the commendation of the chamber, a day after Paul Revere conveyed them from Suffolk County to Philadelphia.
The Massachusetts Government Act restricted unapproved precinct, district, or town meetings, yet did not cite “county” meetings. Hence the rebellious colonists of Massachusetts held County Congresses in rural areas. This did not only help them dodge the British limitations on “town” meetings but also enabled Boston to make widespread basis with rural societies. On September 9, 1774, ambassadors from the 19 Suffolk County towns met in Milton, Massachusetts, and collectively approved the Suffolk Resolves which comprised of 19 objectives that created an apparent public relations plan and campaign for opposing the British. Dr. Joseph Warren, a pioneer of the Sons of Liberty, is the one who drafted the Resolves.

Although the Resolves started with a formal affirmation of allegiance to King George, The Suffolk Resolves clarified that no submission is expected to unconstitutional Parliamentary laws which were a violation of the “Charter of Province, the British Constitution, and the Laws of Nature.” It did not matter to colonial leaders that Parliament had just recently revoked the Charter of Massachusetts Bay because doing as such disregarded both the rights of colonists and natural rights under the British law. Comparative references and reasoning to natural laws would be utilized by Thomas Jefferson when he outlined the Declaration of Independence two years later.
Instead of being intimidated by the oppressive Coercive Acts of 1774, Massachusetts districts reacted by motioning to Parliament that colonial opposition would not only proceed but also increase. The Suffolk Resolves successfully affirmed the Intolerable Acts unlawful and therefore invalid. The Resolves approached the general public of Massachusetts and all the other states to frame governmental organizations financed by the taxes that would be paid by the British government in one way or another. The most challenging declaration called for the equipping of local militias and insubordination of British military government if needed.
When the Suffolk Resolves were sanctioned, they were conveyed by Paul Revere within five days to the Continental Congress in Philadelphia (Ward 19). Comparable statements and resolves of colonial opposition were additionally implemented all over Massachusetts; however, the expertly composed Suffolk Resolves had the additional impact of representing the perspectives of Boston, or, in other words, Suffolk County.
After the Continental Congress affirmed the Suffolk Resolves, British governmental control started to disentangle all over the states. Progressively cohesive colonial opposition and recently rising shadow governments redirected tax income from royal governments. Committees of Safety and the Independent local Committees of Correspondence started taking control over the local authority’s capacities. Local leaders as well started gathering and sorting out local armies. Before the year 1774 came to an end, the Royal Governor of Virginia, John Murray, expressed in a statement to London that organizations of the local army appeared all through the state to defend the Committee and that he was losing control over the colonial government (Daigler 171).

Works Cited
Daigler, Kenneth A. Spies, Patriots, and Traitors: American Intelligence in the Revolutionary War. Georgetown University Press, 2014.
Schlesinger, Arthur Meier. “Political mobs and the American Revolution, 1765-1776.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 99.4 (1955): 244-250.
Ward, Harry M. The War for Independence and the Transformation of American Society: War and Society in the United States, 1775-83. Routledge, 2014.