Totalitarianism In Society

Totalitarianism in society

Introduction

Through this present essay, an emblematic and controversial theme is covered, where past centuries caused great controversy is why it was known as "totalitarianism", this event covers great features, as well as different positions and ways to be called, it is even inThe year of 1951 where Hannah Arendt announced through his work called, "Origins of totalitarianism", the ways in which a state had also to exercise the rise that occurs in society.

Developing

As she of German origin, that is, Jewish faced various difficulties in expressing her ideals and also the analysis she performed, the ideology she maintained is to say in such a way that she obtained, that is why it is mentioned that it was not in hercountry of origin where this important position makes known. As the main purpose of this study is to find those arguments, the relationships and controversies that totalitarianism entails.

As well as those representative events as well as the regimes for which it has been and which is based, likewise those changes on what has been related. Arendt supports those events that occurred in the government of its country mainly, which is described as a way of which you must keep in mind. It is important to know the historical process that contains the conceptualization of what is known as totalitarianism.

As in some analyzes that occurred to be a regime, a set of practices or ways of thinking that characterize men in the same way as social relations.

Taking into account the actions that were sought, as those main leaders who made this type of thought, dealing with the State, were in charge of directing orders towards social masses is then from a point of view it is a political regime.

The different epochs, as well as historical events through which countries passed, the criteria of developing their positions, the way of developing economically and forms of government, one of which is consolidated with great boom is totalitarianism. That is why we take into account the main events and events with which they identified themselves, which today are with which we know them. This being a political regime.

With which its main objective is to have power, which is being directed by a single individual or group, who is responsible for directing and manipulating the lives of citizens directly regardless of what kind belongs, so it is known thatThere is the absence of natural rights, making a historical tour from the moment that the terminology begins to be applied and used or rather.

The appearance occurs in the 20s by fascist leftists, who subsequently consolidated and with great diffusion in the 30s expanding to the Soviet regime. It is therefore that after this concept is had to be clear and more precise to those governments that these forms were attributed, that is, they are totalitarian. Therefore, the twentieth century is known as the century of great totalitarian. The origins.

Mainly of the conceptualization of totalitarianism they are from the thirty years where causing great controversy because it would be submitted as a subject of study regarding philosophy and political science. The conditions to develop, the conditions of expression of the population, at that time they were unusual because the State is the one who was responsible for everything to work its environment that is to say to the ways that contribute a better government and impose its laws.

conclusion

As well as the one that existed any sanction for reasons of opposing. It should be borne in mind that totalitarianism is a way of conceptualizing as mentioned, those types of ideologies and groups which belong to the mandate of the State, in which it covers everything without contemplation by a single leader in order to maintain power totallyat your disposal and expand to new territories in order to have even more power.

In this sense is where Arendt divides in two ways, on the one hand, Hitler’s national socialism and on the otherthey would oppose or be in positions to create an organization outside of which they were imposed by the State.