using the cited articles from the de-extension paper you did for me.

Name:
Tutor:
Course:
Date:
Annotated Bibliography
Holt, William V, Janine L Brown, and Pierre Comizzoli. Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation, 2014. Print.
The authors of the book possess extensive knowledge and ideas in the sciences of animal reproduction. They argue that reproductive science is critical in conservation biology. They explore reproductive science aspects and present the various technological and scientific advancements in the field of de-extinction. The source will be useful in explaining the foundations of de-extinction and the various discoveries concerning the subject.
Jorgensen, Dolly. ‘Reintroduction and De-Extinction.’ BioScience 63.9 (2013): 719-720. Web. 16 June 2015.
The author provides an insight of re-introduction and de-extinction. The researcher argues that the basics of re-introduction can be utilized to achieve de-extinction. The writer suggests a way that can be used to overcome the challenge of opposition to de-extinction. The article is important as it outlines the opposing arguments and the methods that can be employed to counter them.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. An Unnatural History. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. Print.
Elizabeth gives an insight of the various extinctions that have occurred in history. She combines the works of botanists, marine biologists, and geologists, historical and field reporting to give an in-depth discussion of extinct species and those that are vanishing. Her research is essential for understanding the species that are extinct and the human factor in this process.

Martinelli, Lucia, Markku Oksanen, and Helena Siipi. ‘De-Extinction: A Novel and Remarkable Case of Bio-Objectification.’ Croat Med J 55.4 (2014): 423-427. Web. 10 June 2015.
The researchers have extensive knowledge in behavioral science. They analyze de-extinction from a bio-objectification standpoint. According to the authors, the technique is entirely a case of creating new objects and then placing them under the control of human beings. The study is critical in understanding the various methods of achieving de-extinction, its benefits, and the reasons for opposition to de-extinction.
Oksanen, Markku, and Helena Siipi. The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification, 2014. Print.
The authors of the article provide an in-depth description of the ethical issues that surround de-extinction. According to the researchers, conservation biology projects go against the conservation ethics. They offer systematic ethical and philosophical analysis covering animal de-extinction. The paper is important in understanding the ethical guidelines that govern the technologies utilized in de-extinction.

Works Cited
Holt, William V, Janine L Brown, and Pierre Comizzoli. Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation, 2014. Print.
Jorgensen, Dolly. ‘Reintroduction and De-Extinction.’ Bioscience 63.9 (2013): 719-720. Web. 16 June 2015.
Kolbert, Elizabeth. An Unnatural History. London: Bloomsbury, 2014. Print.
Martinelli, Lucia, Markku Oksanen, and Helena Siipi. ‘De-Extinction: A Novel and Remarkable Case of Bio-Objectification.’ Croat Med J 55.4 (2014): 423-427. Web. 10 June 2015.
Oksanen, Markku, and Helena Siipi. The Ethics of Animal Re-Creation and Modification, 2014. Print.

Surname PAGE * MERGEFORMAT 3