a brief presentation draft/outline

Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course
Date
Framing Contests
Introduction
Framing contests are defined as a model applicable in locating a middle ground by comparing between the political and the cognitive models that help in formulating of strategies (Kaplan, 730).
At this point, the frames might serve the function of resources and constraints.
The outcomes of these contests define the best action plan that would serve a meaningful purpose for the society.
The scenario of framing contests is the global health for the Ebola crisis and the issue of food sovereignty.
However, the focus will be on the issue of food sovereignty.
A framework is a structure that works to support the formulation of policies in different systems.
Considering the different views of farming that exists such as the micro-view and coalition building, the best that suits the food sovereignty issue is the micro view (Kaplan, 732).
The micro view explores an issue through the observation of the strategies that successful individuals used in making strategic decisions when faced with issues within their docket.
Using the micro-view model, the issue of food sovereignty can be explored from successful economies point of view.
Considering that there are regions across the world that have curbed the food problem, it is significant to explore the need for food justice and planting of flex crops to help meet the demands of the increasing world population (Alonso-Fradejas et al., 433).
The steps that they took in addressing the food problem will be analyzed and, then, the process will be repeated in other areas for viability in other regions of the world.

It is true that defining and understanding crises and disasters exist.
The understanding is derived from the identification of threats in a certain field of study.
The identified threats will be subjected to risk assessment and their vulnerabilities identified. Therefore, the risks of the identified crises and disasters will be highlighted a high, medium or low.
Testing the reliability and authenticity of reports should be done through carrying out feasibility tests (Kaplan, 737).
Repeating the processes identified in the report will help confirm whether the reports are reliable and authentic or not.
The best way to monitor how nations react to crises is through the use of human watch groups that are not supported by any government agency.
The risks of non-prioritization are noted in the failure of systems as well as losses.
Conclusion
Framing contests model requires the view of both political and cognitive perspectives.
In solving food sovereignty, a micro view approach is appropriate.
Crises and disasters are identifiable and risk management should be used in measuring them.
However, priority should be extended to most urgent crises and disasters.
Work Cited
Alonso-Fradejas, Alberto, et al. “Food sovereignty: convergence and contradictions, conditions and challenges.” (2015): 431-448.
Kaplan, Sarah. “Framing contests: Strategy making under uncertainty.” Organization Science 19.5 (2008): 729-752.