American Democracy And The Two Sides Of The Currency

American democracy and the two sides of the currency

Introduction.

 It is necessary to mention that the end of this essay is to show a vision based on the book The federalist focused on number 10, because I consider that democracy is not the best government method because there is no complete control of the factions for whichI propose a federal government in order to moderate these events.

Developing

In order to understand democracy and factions, we must begin with the origin in ancient times as these points were seen for this I will mention Madison that the democracy of the cities-states of antiquity tells us, in which a small number of citizens gather andadminister the government in person with the modern republic based on representation. 

This is very important as long as we understand the context, since we focus on Athens where relatively those Politain were, who could participate in politics, therefore the administration and involvement of them could be controlled, since in fact that wasone of the reasons that I exalt to Athens, their participation, and from that point of view to being few and each one to have a type of experience.

It was less likely that they were corrupted because it was they who created their own laws and according to it they applied them and had to apply it evidently applied a direct democracy, that is, in a few words, all citizens participated in politics and made decisions more consistent with theirCollective convenience in their status as equals, because they all had a different mentality in which they recognized themselves as citizens and their polis as more than their home being clear other type of thought and values were applied, but this did not mean that it did not fail from anyway, it is more than clear that this ideal does not prosper, however they implanted ideals such as the raffle which we would later apply, because returning to reality we cannot fall into simple comparisons because as our times mentioned they are not the same.

Likewise, passing time we reaffirm that pure democracy is not the best response, if what we seek is justice and equality, because always the problems of the factions will be present and where a majority group will have more power and money. Our government is too unstable, that the public good is not contemplated in conflicts between rival parties and that the measures taken are often decided by the upper force of an interested and despotic majority and not in accordance with the rules of justice and justice andof the rights of less numerous parties.

Conclusions.

At this point in history we can observe that pure democracy causes an unstable government where we see personal interests, factions prevail and obviously the common good is not the main, a democracy where there are political groups or simply the citizens themselves lose interest inExercising their vote, since they feel that it does not affect anything, because the groups with greater power will have control of everything, which focuses more on what it can gain what it can give and this is obviously not being fair to anyone,Because you cannot be a judge and part at the same time in the sense of, that the great majordemocratic