Behavior Change

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Name
Date of Submission
Behavior change
Introduction
Humans have the ability to perceive, critically think and make decisions based on the things they interact with on a daily basis in the world. As a result, socially modified experiences created making one develop a given behavior.
It clearly shows that individuals have the ability to think and make decisions by organizing the world derived socially. So what one develops and become in future is based on the power of knowledge gained as experience in life (Albert, 283). It is what is used to interpret worldly object differently since we all are unique. This eventually leads to certain behavior change of which may be or bad. As a result, anomie occurs where the cultural norm breaks down due to rapid changes. Been that it derives one character then possible behavior change must occur. And the worst part been that each individual perceives things in the world in different ways hence the deviant might believe they are right but it’s vice versa. As a result, individual now decides to realize their goals then form a means of achieving them by any means whether acceptable or not acceptable(Albert, 288). They now decide to either accept or deny adaptive characteristics like conforming, innovations, ritualization, retreatism or rebellion in order just to fit in and feel that he is part of the society. (Merton, 673)
Am agreeing with the theories on the context that, one may be born normally with the capability of speaking as an inherited character trait from the parents.

The words that will be learnt to be spoken must just be those which are socially accepted.
Am not agreeing with the stated theories since the idea that everyone always looks and understand things in their own way is a lie because a time group of people example students occupy the same place and taught or exposed to a given same experience they will automatically think and critic it the same way.
The difference shown is that laws are made and people are to abide by them or undergo punishment for not following the made rules in the society (Paul, 338). Unlike the other two theories where there is freedom in doing things. The similarity shown is that environment can be made up in many social aspects or exists in a way to realize behavior change of the individual after thinking critically and making the decision upon thinking of the consequences that will prevail afterward.
In conclusion, one is capable doing things at will or be forced to but will depend upon the knowledge which they receive as an experience that does make develop the behavior change.
Reference
Schutz, Alfred. “Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action.” Collected Papers I. Springer, Dordrecht, 1962. 3-47.Merton, Robert K. “Social structure and anomie.” American sociological review 3.5 (1938): 672-682.
Cilliers, Paul. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. routledge, 2002.