Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

CA red light camera’s (method of promoting safe driving vs. generating city revenue)

0 / 5. 0

Words: 1650

Pages: 6

55

CA red light camera’s (method of promoting safe driving vs. generating city revenue). The California vehicle code (CVC) 21453 (a) represents a vital traffic law that targets at promoting safe driving on the roads. It is essential that drivers observe the rule as it directs on safe driving to caution against landing in compromising traffic situation. Despite the efficiency of the traffic light system in controlling the flow of traffic, the rules affirm the essence of the roads signs and signal in ensuring a driving rationale on the roads (Fleck 46). The CVC 21453 (a) provides a precautionary limitation on drivers to safely drive without infractions or causing unnecessary blocking of other routes. The traffic code is bound to ensuring an orderly flow of traffic while drivers take caution on the roads.
Nevertheless, the CVC 21453 (a) represents a drop in the ocean and only accounts as a partial solution to a mega and integrated traffic system problems. The code only addresses a single item concerning adherence to the traffic signs and signals. The issues associated with stopping at the ‘red signal’ constitutes a series of concerns whereby legal interventions are necessary. The CVC 21453 (a) requires the driver to strictly adhere to completely stopping at the flash of the red sign. Arguably, some drivers would temporarily stop which translates to being on standby and hence a violation of the traffic signal (Fleck 47). The violation of the CVC code amounts to a hefty fine to the concerned drivers.

Wait! CA red light camera’s (method of promoting safe driving vs. generating city revenue) paper is just an example!

The large ocean of traffic concerns also envisions the turn of events regarding proceeding after taking a halt. The driver presumes rational thought while making a way to turn to another direction considering incoming and outgoing traffic. The driver must ensure that it is safe to turn on to another street while the respective signal is made or is required to wait until it is safe to move. The code also addresses pedestrians who should refrain from the use of junctions which has red signals. The ultimate flow of traffic is rarely discussed in the code whereas it constitutes a massive flaw and unclear stipulation on what is primarily applicable in different situations.
The rule of making a complete stop could be interpreted as time wasting and unnecessary as it would result in heavy traffic on the roads. A complete halt translates to the turning off the engine at or before the limit line at the flashing of the red signal. Regardless of being a preventive measure and enhancement of the traffic lights operation, the rule does not factor in time wasted between switching off an engine and then turning it back on. The traffic code encompasses hefty fines for the slightest violation making it a convenient source of revenue for the California state authority.
The seriousness of the CVC 21453 (a), manifest in the kind of consequences of the traffic offense. A deduction of the driving license points is effected, and a further fine of up to $490 is imposed. The strictness on the act indicates the criticalness of traffic offenses as they could lead to fatal consequences. It is therefore imperative to precisely adhere to the traffic rules provision to stay away from legal pursuit and imposing of very tough repercussion. Moreover, the CVC 21453 (a) represents the most common traffic code in California whereby numerous cases have been on record concerning the violation of the traffic code. The charging for the violation of the law occurs directly through automated capture cameras or a traffic officer.
The failure to clear the charged tickets in violation of the code 21453, harsher legal consequences may be effected on the driver. The violation may be filed and charged as an infraction, and the pursuit of prosecution may result in loss of insurance advantage and loss of significant DMV points of the driver. The rules surrounding the importance of the red traffic light illustrates a long-standing and extensive problem regarding driver’s version of the rules and the traffic department management. The discrepancy in the interpretation of the code further provides complication making it more common for the drivers to find themselves on the wrong side mostly without their knowledge.
The address of the traffic problems in California seems to focus on the generation of revenue orientation rather than the provision of safety as far as the red traffic lights control is concerned. The numerous case of violation of the 21453 (a) code reveals the existence of a larger problem rather than the basic perception of honoring the red light and the corresponding traffic rules. The extension on the traffic codes relating to the ‘red light’ traffic observation further illustrates much inconvenience on the driver to observe and adhere to all the traffic codes without putting in a foot wrong (Fleck 46). A contemplative thinking about the legal traffic codes concerning the regulation and control of the red light significance constitutes the highest of traffic concerns while the problem keeps escalating.
The problem of the red lights controls and traffic charges in violation of codes relating to the applicability of ‘red lights’ stopping requirement is critical. The challenge proves to be dependent on the philosophy of lawmakers rather than the affected drivers. The lawmakers do not offer the slightest room for the drivers to at any moment twist the traffic rules. The lawmakers regard the adherence to the CVC traffic codes as being the essence of safe and secure roads in California. The failure to incorporate the perception of the drivers reflects on the CVC codes as being tough and also a flawed approach to collecting revenues from the roads.
In the event that the issue of stopping and the flash of the red signal at the rightfully stated points switch end and the drivers take the wheel, the extent to which violation of such offenses. Furthermore, the problem is only one sided whereby it fails to render an integrated system that allows room for reasonable permission to rely on human rationale other than automatic traffic systems. The philosophy of the lawmakers does not allow for the drivers to decide while navigating through the roads. It is thus an inconvenience to leave the entire matter of traffic control in the hand of automatic traffic system while the drivers are on the receiving end. It is vital to incorporate flexibility in the interpretation and applicability of the CVC traffic codes.
It is ideal to raise the question that would translate to be rhetoric without a profound response irrespective of the perception of different personalities. It is critical to ask questions on the effectiveness of the California traffic codes and the ultimate objective of the CVC traffic codes. The identification of a large problem necessitates the shift of paradigm on the end of the lawmakers to accommodate necessary legislation to address the flaws in the current system (Fleck 48). The questions on the high level of traffic charges relating to violation of the ‘red lights’ traffic codes should be alarming the lawmakers. The obligation to focus on road safety should be the guiding principle in handling the traffic violations which in most cases are petty.
The articulation of more questions translates to the rise in concerns to enhance the operation of the CVC traffic codes. The focus on the big picture would only involve the inquisition on the shortcomings on the current provision and applicability of the traffics codes. It is imperative to find the right balance in the enhancing of road safety by adopting legislative provision and also revenue collection through fines. The primary question is on the best practice applicable to alleviate the present shortcomings of traffic rules in California being ineffective. The larger problem will escalate if necessary measures are not put in place to balance the interest of the lawmakers and the road users.
The solution to the present traffic control and suitability of the CVC traffic codes lays in the hands of the traffic department whereby with the right alteration, the traffic problems could be streamlined easily. The coordination of the traffic signals with human capital would be more effective than assigning automatic traffic system which is rigid in decision making. The traffic police can conveniently offer substantial support to ensure the automated system does not unnecessarily halt and congest the roads. The other notable change would involve amendments to the traffic codes to reflect more on the need to enhance road safety rather than an emphasis on economic gains of the fines. The traffic police and the pack of lawmakers should deliberate on the appropriate mechanism to manage traffic in California.
The conflicting interest involves the focus of the authorities in nabbing wrongdoers and violators of the CVC codes to ensure they remit fines to the state government. On the other hand, the drivers and the public are concerned with rules and policies that enhance road safety at all times (Fleck 46). The conflicting interest of making revenue for the states and enhancing of road safety has been the pillar for the ineffectiveness of the rules and the traffic department failures. The mess in the traffic management saga is founded on the conflicting matter of interest and has threatened to tarnish the reputation of traffic department of California.
The provision of a personal assessment of the traffic sloppiness in California despite high legal clauses is significant in the formulating of a sustainable solution. The essential facts include the non-participation of traffic police to the highest of their capabilities while the automatic control mechanism does not comprise the most accurate gadgets. Personally, the solution the traffic crisis of California has a lot of toxic elements within that needs to be eliminated as soon as possible. The pursuit of minor traffic violation indicates the dominance of revenue-focused approach.
It is imperative to provide necessary relaxation on the CVC traffic codes that ensure that drivers at their capacity comprehend the rules. The high number of traffic codes violation charges could be significantly being dropped if the traffic police coordinate the traffic signals especially on busy and highly crowded highways in the states. It is ideal for human intervention to eliminate the unwarranted error of an automatic traffic system to allow flexibility in the management and control of the traffic in major cities in California.

Get quality help now

Top Writer

Nicolas Deakins

5.0 (417 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

I need to work a lot; that’s why I really didn’t have a single minute to focus on my thesis writing. These guys from Essay-samples are real saviors. I don’t know how they knew what my professor expected to receive, but they definitely succeeded.

View profile

Related Essays

Case Study Drug Addiction

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Sunjata the Archetypal Hero

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Play Therapy

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Cyberattack Brief

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Liberalism versus Sociolism

Pages: 1

(275 words)

History Islam Text 3

Pages: 1

(275 words)

History Islam Text 2

Pages: 1

(275 words)