Cases involving social responsibility

Human Resource and Social Responsibility
Name
Institutional Affiliation

Human Resource and Social Responsibility
Case One: Financial Dilemma
The issue surrounding the case involves distribution of limited resources to clients. Stanwick and Stanwick (2013) iterate that rules of utilitarianism state that a person should choose an option which creates maximum utility. As such, the services in the center should promote their services locally with hopes of increasing self-pay clients. The increased revenue will cater for the 25 percent cut by the state and cushion the center from financial difficulties.
Cases of drug addiction vary in degree from one person to the next. As a human resource professional, the NOHSE guidelines demand that clients receive services without discrimination CITATION Eth16 l 1033 (Ethical Standards for Human Resource Professionals, 2016). Thus, the center should have a waitlist to ensure every person gets a fair chance for treatment.
Given that the center handles critical human conditions, the Human Resource Department can organize a fundraising from the neighboring schools, churches, and neighborhoods to cater for the extra 150 people left out. In so doing, the charges for treatment remain the same without any negative effect on the center.
Case Two: Ethics and Social Controversy
The core issue facing the committee is funding for abortion-related services. If some affiliated organization seeks to create negative publicity. The board should focus on matters common to all parties.

For example, they can counteract any bad publicity with issues of sex education, family planning, and abortion counseling offered by this particular center. In so doing, the donors will see a better side of the argument as noted under the utilitarian approach CITATION Sta13 l 1033 (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2013). The tactic resolves the issue of negative publicity for donors and the organization.
On the other hand, NOHSE (2016) stipulates that there should be an amicable discussion of issues before any legal or formal solutions are considered. Therefore, the board should hold a meeting with anti-abortion groups aimed for peace. The meeting will allow the Planned Parenting Agency to defend their side as they share with members of those groups.
The other decision would involve seeking the counsel of the donors on whether to stop funding any firm which supports abortion. A final decision can easily be reached without any financial setbacks. More so, the donors will feel appreciated by the Federation.
Case Five: Human Services and the Law
According to the NOHSE guidelines on responsibility to Clients, the personnel maintain the privacy of clients unless it might cause harm to others CITATION Eth16 l 1033 (Ethical Standards for Human Resource Professionals, 2016). Thus, the Center should ascertain if there is danger before contacting law and order. Most of the fracas comes from young adults who might be naïve and arrogant. Besides, Islam is a religion not a terrorist organization.
Rules of utilitarianism demand that decisions are made to attain the best solution CITATION Sta13 l 1033 (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2013). Accordingly, Refugee Resettlement Center should consider having federal funded officers working there for the safety of innocent refugees and the whole nation. If a person has no ill intention, then they have nothing to worry about.
These few young Muslims should receive proper training from the Human Resource Educators to avoid issues. As such, they will come to understand the general atmosphere of the country. More so, counseling reduces the number of radicalized youth in the community.
Case Six: Labor-Management Disputes
Striking would be the best solution because continuing to work under harsh condition affects the profession after the long-run CITATION Sta13 l 1033 (Stanwick & Stanwick, 2013). For example, few people will dedicate their lives to medicine or social work due to financial and social concerns. As a utilitarian, adhering to the decision protects me and my patient for a longer while.
As a firm believer in a Supreme Being, striking might appear wrong and places the lives of current patients at risk. Nonetheless, the other option will affect more patients if more staff members lose their jobs because the union will be weak. Therefore, striking is ethically right.
The remaining staff will have a large work load which is unfair and illegal CITATION Eth16 l 1033 (Ethical Standards for Human Resource Professionals, 2016). Besides, abusing the rights of health workers will not solve financial problems. The hospital can organize fundraising in the local community or from outside to protect the health institution.

References
BIBLIOGRAPHY l 1033 Ethical Standards for Human Resource Professionals. (2016). Retrieved November 20, 2016, from NOHSE- National Organization for Human Services.
Stanwick, P., & Stanwick, S. (2013). Understanding Business Ethics. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.