Democracy: Opinion Law

Democracy: Opinion Law

Introduction

Democracy is a form of organization, through which people announce their opinions of what they think about what is discussed. Likewise, democracy is defined as a political system that defends the sovereignty of the people and the right of the people to choose and control their rulers, in which collective decisions are adopted by the people through mechanisms for direct and indirect participation. Direct democracy is when political decisions are made through votes. 

Developing

The indirects is the type of democracy is one that is exercised through representatives. In the classroom democracy applies to different circumstances as at the time we have to choose our classroom representatives so that when there is a meeting he or she communicates us all and before this we can say that democracy helps us choose a representativeeither by botos. It is also stated that democracy was given since ancient times.

In order to be able to have an order in state Martha Luza Zamalloa. Together with history we will say that the existence of the State, in Peru, dates back to the formation of preinka society 8-10 thousand years before Christ and Inka 500 years before the arrival of the Spaniards;In the establishment of the Great Tahuantinsuyo, which analyzing in the light of the West political sciences, as indicated by the name, it is inclusive and means the state of the nations of the four of theirs (regions, cardinal points, or four stations).

That is to say the Confederate State Inka, whose basic unity, in economic, political, social was a ayllu, a collectivist organization in essence, testifying in this way that it was nothing imperialism. Just as Eric Hobsbawm said that the twentieth century had been brief: it began with World War I and ended with the fall of the Berlin Wall. The events, not the calendars, are the ones that mark the times. 

conclusion

One might be asked, to the shelter of that umbrella, when he began post -Fujimorist Peruvian democracy, whether with Paniagua or Toledo, and when he also ended, if with the choice of PPK, his resignation, or with the pardon to Alberto Fujimori. Historians will have, when the retrospective forces them to order, an opinion in this regard. And they will tell us more or less success what name this kind of transition carries.