First Day Of Frankfurt School

First day of Frankfurt School

Introduction

This era of modernity was characterized by radical transformations that questioned the paradigms in force around the routes that would occupy reality. His main concern was presented in the manifestations of the movements and revolutions of the European proletariat, the critics of this school emphasized the economic and worker aspects. 

In 1930, the direction of the Institute was in charge of Max Horkheimer, who assumed a more theoretical character, with the incorporation of Herbert Marcuse, Theodore Adorno and the Literature sociologist Leo Lowenthal became the central nucleus of this school. The objective of the founders of the Frankfort School, was both financial and intellectual independence, anti -Semitism, Nazism, studies on authority, cultural industries and dialectic, Marcuse’s one -dimensional man.

Developing

One of the most profitable aspects of dialectical imagination was the opportunity to find many people who played a crucial role in the history of the Frankfort school, the dialectical imagination aims to interrogate the images against its multiple artistic representations such as: painting, cinema, literature and music. For Eduardo Grüner, culture especially the work of art, is a battlefield, an area where the fight for representations of the world and the subject, the image and the word is played. A Warburguian policy develops.

The influence of the culture of Greco-Roman antiquity in history should be thought of under the symbol of a double apolo-dionysus brotherhoods.

In the comment of one of his conferences about the appearance of ancient idealism in the painting of the first rebirth. Insisted on the fundamental role that fulfilled antiquity for the emergence of a growing dynamism in the Florentine painting of the fifteenth century.

Aby Warburg organized in its own way, in it among the cracks unexpected in the blank space between the adjacent but not united images. Grüner sees the possibility of emerging new readings and associations to allow the return of the repressed and will explore works by Pasolini, Lanzamnn and Antonioni and with Cage with the silent oratory.

Warburg warned how the workshops that start this task of reviving and intensifying the forms of ancient art continued, in turn, satisfying the demands of the traditional image, which is why new finish developing a mixed style in which both were perfectly differentiableTrends and wills.

conclusion

Grüner creates a criticism of culture, called the conflictive anthropology of the images, establishing relationships between the works of the Renaissance and modernity. Venus’s indócillera indócillera is significant, whipped by winds of contradictory addresses. The modern era where society is pretended peaceful and stable, houses its other inscindible and gifted self. 

Grüner is aimed. Grüner explains that when the concepts of idealizations and indirectness of modernity are cleaned, it means capitalism.