Introduction to Politics Revised

Student’s Name:
Instructor’s Name:
Course Number:
Date:
Introduction to Politics
Question One
It remains now to consider in what ways a ruler should act concerning his subjects and allies. How men live is so not quite the same as how they ought to experience that a ruler who doesn’t do what is done, will undermine his power as opposed to look after it. However, that a ruler who needs dependably to act respectably is encompassed by numerous corrupt men, his destruction will be unavoidable. Subsequently, a leader who would wish to maintain his power must be prepared to act improperly.
Question Two
As per Machiavelli, for one to be viewed as liberal, they must spend sumptuously and pompously. The result of being liberal is that the ruler will devour every one of his assets in rich presentation. It is shrewder to develop notoriety for unpleasantness, which will prompt reputation yet not to scorn. This is superior to being constrained, through needing to be viewed as liberal, to cause notoriety for avarice, which will prompt reputation and to disdain too. Then again, a ruler ought to need to be thought tolerant, not pitiless. In any case, one ought to fare thee well not to be tolerant in a fitting way. On the off chance that a ruler can keep his subjects united and steadfast, he ought not to stress over bringing about notoriety for cold-bloodedness. A “good” ruler ought not to be just, but rather needs to work with realities.
Question Three
Whether men bear friendship relies on upon them, however whether they are anxious will rely on upon what the ruler does.

A shrewd ruler ought to depend on what is under his control, not on what is under the control of others. He ought to think up just to abstain from bringing about hatred.
Question Four
When a ruler is exceptionally merciful, upright, trustworthy, devout and humane, he contrives to conquer and praised by everyone for the common people are impressed by his or her appearances and his or her results. In the political world today, less of the leaders seem to possess such qualities. Most of them are there on the seats for fame, material gain and misuse of their power.
Question Five
Machiavelli says that fortune is the referee of half people’s activities. It provides them with the chance of controlling the other half. He likewise says that a ruler who trusts completely to luck ends up badly when his luck runs out. Fortunes are not good in legislative issues and destroy the ruler’s understanding and control over their power. I totally agree with Machiavelli’s conclusion on fortunes and urge rulers to react effectively on their parts and not to rely on upon fortunes. Else, they will wind up being frustrated when fortunes needs to follow up on their side.
References
Machiavelli, Niccolò, and Rufus Goodwin. The Prince. Boston: Dante University Press, 2003. Print.