Nora Character’S Evolution Within The Work Casa De Dolls

Nora character’s evolution within the work Casa de Dolls

Introduction

The work Casa de Dolls first published in 1879 in Teatro Real de Copenhagen correspondence to the genre Drama, written by the author of Norwegian nationality Henry Johan Ibsen his theater represents most of the time the well -defined moral and ethical profiles of his characters, the workIt is located in context where Norway was culturally contradate by Denmark and economically by Sweden process where the Danes lost their shops and causing their industrial development to be paralyzA clash of cultures and ideologies. Doll Casa represents Nora’s rejection of a conservative society that forces her to live like a doll inside a false marriage.

Developing

The inclination of the playwright Henry Johan Ibsen in the literature arose after his studies for medicine, starting with a series of his creations such as poems, and theatrical pieces to works of dramatic-romantic gender, he was considered as the father of realism of the realism of thesame way that gave the background of today’s symbolism, the author’s works were characterized by being controversial by showing the clash of moral and ethical values of the society of the time. 

The main idea of the evolution of Nora’s character within the work of Casa de Doll. Through the use of the theater structure (exhibition, knot, climax), the dialogues of the work, Nora’s character as elements to develop the essay will be necessary.

In the exhibition of the work the character of Nora shows the complexity of the life of the protagonist that, if inside his house he lived as wife, mother, or as a doll.

Throughout history, the work goes through a chronological order being in the first act where the reality of the child personality, submissive, dependent and the comfortable environment that Nora possesses in the part of the dialogue is presented.

"Nora. – I have just arrived. (Save the Cucurucho de Confites in your pocket and clean your mouth). Come here, Torvaldo;Look at the purchases I have made.

Helmer. – Do not interrupt me. (Shortly after he opens the door and appears with the pen in his hand, looking in all directions). Buying, you say? All that? Has the little girl found the way of spending money?"

In the previous text, the way in which Helmer treats his wife as evidenced in the word of “little girl” can be evidencethe.

Therefore, in relation to the text in one way or another, the relationship of domain-obedience of man and woman is something totally natural in society according to the historical context in which the work is written.

Among the knot of the work, Helmer holds part of a dialogue with Nora where she shows himself as a docile woman who remains submissive from her childoppression of a patriarchal society where he did not poetry the control of his life forcing her to live in an ideal world under the comforts allowed by that doll life.

"Helmer. – You are an original creature. Equal to your father. With the best good will in the world, working to earn money. And he drained from his fingers when he had it. Anyway, you have to take how you are. Yes, yes, Nora, those things are hereditary, undoubtedly … "

The above explains the thought that the author shows about the woman of the time where the role of woman in society was conditioned, it is adopted with the reality with which Nora lives that she became the daughter of her father to wife and successivelyMother without a manual or someone who guided her, without these conditions she could not refuse to the role demanded by society to follow.

Therefore, it is understood that the role of men and women are already predestined following the evolution of the human being where the man went hunting and the woman stays at home, where man is strong sex and woman the womanWeak sex with the only difference that the human being was civilized, however, his way of thinking did not change drastically.

In this context already known the truth that tormented Nora serves to realize that her marriage was false and that her sacrifice and efforts would never be recognized, for her husband who instead of thanking her judged her and abused her verballyand that will help you awaken from that state of submission.

In the climax of the work and in the scene of greatest controversy of the work it is the where Nora closes the door in the face her husband said act broke all kinds of scheme of the perfect woman of the then then.

Therefore, he will show a Nora now not selfless when sacrificed before the collapse of her husband, in this way the author presents us to a protagonist who despite the subjugation of society is able to face the problems bravely said reality will cause the realitythat something changed in Nora when recognizing itself as a human being and that also has rights and that must be valued acquiring its own consciousness and not that of a doll used by Helmer acquiring the value to leave that dollhouse.

conclusion

In conclusion, the playwright Henry Ibsen criticizes society, but mainly to the woman with her character of Nora who presents us as the typical women of the time were treated that did not spend more of wives and mothers who had to show obedience and respect To their husbands, to some extent one could conclude that women did not care much that they did not receive love, that they were deceived as long as they had a man who kept them being something that the author wanted to express in his work, Both at the beginning and until the end with the help of the structure of the joint work with the acts, the evolution of Nora history was appreciated, which tried to seek its dignity as a human being, it must be taken into account that Henry Ibsen aspired to talk about the Liberation of the human being, so the figure of the woman was the best option to be something atypical at that time to represent it, consequently a symbol of feminism became a symbol in E The next year.