Pro-Vida: Today’S Abortion

Pro-Vida: today’s abortion

Introduction

Today, the issue of abortion is very popular and thanks to globalization, this issue invades social networks and is brought to discussion both in Mexico and in many other parts of the world. Those who are against, are called Provida and those who are in favor of the woman deciding what to do, are called pro-decision.

 Someone decides, without them knowing, if they will live or die. That "someone" is her mother and that "decision" is called abortion.  This is one of the multiple arguments that are used by the provida when the issue enters discussion, however, is the life of the mother forced to give birth into account?, The child once born?, Is these really live?.

Developing

93% of countries that prohibit abortion are developing countries, these are estimated that 55% are safe (that is, they are carried out using a recommended method and by an appropriately trained supplier); 31% are less safe (they comply with the criterion of the method or supplier); and 14% are nothing safe (they do not comply with either of the two criteria). 

Do not use a good method and a resulting trained provider in 42% of maternal deaths. The penalty of abortion does not prevent it from being carried out, in fact, it only makes women abort clandestinely which can cause medical complications or even death. Its legalization, on the other hand, offers a safer process and helps save lives in the process.

As an example of this, MSF said in 2018 that, after the legalization of abortion in South Africa in 1996, various studies confirmed that, by 2000, maternal mortality due to non -safe abortions had been reduced by 91%; In addition, the number of women with infections caused by these procedures had been reduced by half. 

¨2,6 million newborns worldwide died when they fulfilled their first month of life, and seven thousand newborns die every day. ¨ These are the alarming numbers of deaths registered in 2018 by the UICEF in developing countries. Of these, 2/5 are children born of unwanted pregnancies. Provida fight because these children are born, regardless of the economic, emotional, family or personal conditions in which their parents are. 

There are many abandoned children, in conditions of poverty, hunger, in situations of harassment, forced work or in orphanages who are not enjoying their human rights and are not fully living. Why would a provide proclaimed themselves defender of lives?. Finally, according to the URAC, an embryo does not begin to develop its nervous system until week 6 and the embryo does not become fetus until 10.

 This means that, until this week, you cannot feel or function as a living being. Therefore, a fetus does not suffer when aborted within this period, which is usually the legal period to do so. Here is an discussion to want to save the life of a set of cells in formation, that of a woman who will run when undergoing a clandestine abortion or that of a child who did not want to bring the world.

conclusion

They can call me cold when I say that I am in favor of abortion, that I have no heart and that I do not defend the right to the life of the baby to be born, but it is not so, I defend the life of those who already were born, we think and feel. I defend the woman and her right to decide for her body. I see overpopulation problems and I do not understand the need to bring forced children to the world, I think no one should be forced to be a father or mother regardless of reason. 

I believe in the human right to live, but I do not believe that there is meaning to do it, to live fully love, health and happiness, something that a child brought to the world is necessary by obligation does not usually have or something that is usually taken from a forced woman to have a child. For these reasons and many others, it seems hypocritical from a Provide to advocate so much for the child inside the belly when there are so many lives outside that they need more help. Are they provida, or pro – childbirth?