Theory Of The Communist Party Manifesto

Theory of the Communist Party Manifesto

Introduction

Marx gives a broad description of what communism is, as theory and as a political movement. Perhaps the most significant aspect of this theory of history is what he does not consider important. In Marx’s theory, history is formed only by economic relations. Elements such as religion, culture, ideology and even individual human being play a very small role. Communist theory simply describes an ongoing historical movement at this time. This includes the abolition of private property.

The manifesto begins by addressing the theme of class antagonism. Marx opens his text by saying: The whole history of human society, until the day, is a story of class struggles. Class antagonisms have been simplified as society is increasingly divided into two rival fields: the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The rich have become the most powerful class, he says, the means of production, the heavy machinery and the agricultural lands and exploit and oppress the workers’ proletariat, maintaining the benefit for themselves. 

Developing

The proletarians live only while they can find work, and can find work only while their work increases capital. They are a kind of merchandise and are vulnerable to all market fluctuations. Marx describes the worker as a soldier and as a slave. The manifesto argues that this development is inevitable, and that capitalism is inherently unstable. The communists intend to promote this revolution and promote the parties and associations that are moving the story towards their natural conclusion.

They argue that the elimination of social classes cannot be achieved through reforms or changes in government. Rather, a revolution will be required.

However, with the modern development of the industry, the proletariat increased in number, became stronger and more concentrated. The proletariat is also helped in its unification by the increase in the media made possible by modern industry, allowing the struggles to acquire a national character. In addition, while other classes try to use proletarians to promote their own political purposes, they give them tools to fight the bourgeoisie.

The immediate objective of the communists is identical to that pursue. He also says that the bourgeoisie accuses the proletariat of wanting to eliminate private property. Communism, he explains, just wants to get rid of the property of the bourgeoisie, thus putting the means of production in the hands of the community in general without considering personal belongings.

Marx writes: you will terrify that we want to abolish private property, as if already within your current society, private property was not abolished for nine tenths of the population. Despite what the bourgeoisie affirms, communism does not prevent people from appropriating work products. Rather, it prevents them from subjugating others in the process of this appropriation.

conclusion

Some measures that Marx proposed and complied with: the inclusion of women to the workforce are all, men, women and children, mere work instruments, among which there is no more difference than that of the cost. Public and free education for all children is not implemented, but I think it is a great advance that today is an obligation that all children must be educated and the articulation between agricultural and industrial farms is seen in all products processed that we consume day by day.

On the other hand, Marx did not contemplate the individual freedom of the people to decide, he only saw the people as one. Also, in my opinion, he failed in the conception of the administration of a State, since apparently seen historically it is practically impossible for a State to last without a government, independent of the social classes, someone must administer and control society. The author postulated that with the revolution capitalism would be eliminated, however, property is necessary for production and, therefore, capitalism is strengthened rather than abolished.