Dicussion Question

Coursework Discussion Question
Student Name
Institution Affiliations
Date

The philosophical viewpoint of judicial activism and restraint, second language, and morality.
The opposing philosophical view of judicial activism and restraint
Judicial activism means the opposite of the judicial restraint. They are terms that get used to referring to the philosophy that the judicial decisions get lodged. Judicial activism is a court judgment theory that considers the dynamics of time as the community changes beliefs, while judicial restraint depends on the interpretation of the law based on the earlier cases as judges leave the system to others. The judges who get restrained upholds the principle of stare decisis, the precedents created by former judges. That creates the confusion of justice system because judges end to think they can solve all community challenges and then start legislative and executive duties and serious problems are likely to happen. They equally may lack resources to address all of the issues in the community (Negi, n.d).
Second language accessibility issues in the judiciary
Consider developing a language access policy plan. The plan could entail a glossary of most used words, the process to get used by officers to access language assistance under various conditions of service, standards for training personnel of language access, and the information on notifying, the public on the department of language assistance services (Shah et al., n.d).
Personal values conflict with the ethical duties and responsibilities of a public servant
Conflict, in this case, means a scenario where public officials may have other ownership interests that seem to affect their official obligations.

The problem with it is that it comes to interfere with the official duties. It interferes by allowing the professional having specific responsibilities but conflicts with personal morality. In dealing with such disputes in the community, I would determine how own interests interfere with the personal judgment am supposed to execute in my official roles and go out of it when possible (McDonald, n.d).
Aligning personal morality with the responsibilities of a public servant
One can align individual morality with the duties of the public by coping with different roles such as the duties in private life, duties of the family, professional duties, duties in the area of jurisdiction, and those towards the community. There is no need to withdraw services from the public. They can be balanced by having personal integrity that involves taking honest stands (GKToday, 2016)

References
GKToday. (2016, August 11). Ethics in Private and Public Relationships. Retrieved October 23, 2018, from https://www.gktoday.in/gk/ethics-in-private-and-public-relationships/
McDonald, M (n.d) Ethics and Conflict of Interest. Retrieved October 23, 2018, from https://ethics.ubc.ca/peoplemcdonaldconflict-htm/
Negi, A. (n.d). Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint. Retrieved October 23, 2018, from http://www.legalservicesindia.com/article/2019/Judicial-Activism-and-Judicial-Restraint.htmlShah, S., Rahman, I., & Khashu, A. (n.d). Overcoming Language Barriers. Solutions for Law Enforcement, 1-20. Retrieved October 23, 2018, from https://www.lep.gov/resources/vera_translating_justice_final.pdf.