Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

Discussion on failures to replicate

0 / 5. 0

Words: 275

Pages: 1

70

Discussion
Student’s Name
Institution
Discussion
A failure to replicate a study has emerged as a notable current issue in modern psychology. When a large number of studies in psychology were re-done, two-thirds of them did not produce the results they were claimed to in the initial research CITATION Ved15 l 1033 (Vedantam, 2015). As critical the issue might sound, this is not that big of a problem. That is so because when a study is conducted, many internal and external factors are taken into consideration. While some of these factors are temporary, others can be permanent as well. Later on, when the study is replicated in the future, it is possible that the permanent factors remained the same but temporary ones got turned upside down.
With that under consideration, it is not rational to expect that all types of studies will replicate in all circumstances. For studies conducted in other areas where data stays the same, e.g., economics, same results can be expected. However, for a subject like psychology, since sensitive human information is involved, things can never be expected to stay the same. Although this does not doubt the authenticity of previous studies to a major extent, there is a possibility that the academic and practical strength of these research papers is put to a test.
Taking the case of external validity as an example, while a study is credible in an internal and controlled environment, it cannot be generalized to external environments where multiple factors are outside of the researcher’s grasp CITATION Gil151 l 1033 (Gilbert, King, Pettigrew, & Wilson, 2015).

Wait! Discussion on failures to replicate paper is just an example!

This makes the results of the research borderline false. That is because while theoretically, those factors were in the right state at the right time, they could not hold their original shape which reduces the overall benefits of the work done.
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY Gilbert, D., King, G., Pettigrew, S., & Wilson, T. (2015). Comment on “Estimating the Responsibility of Psychological Science”. Technical Comment, 351(1), 1-3. Retrieved February 5, 2018
Vedantam, S. (2015, August 28). Scientific Findings Often Fail To Be Replicated, Researchers Say. Retrieved February 5, 2018, from NPR Website: https://www.npr.org/2015/08/28/435416046/research-results-often-fail-to-be-replicated-researchers-say

Get quality help now

Top Writer

John Findlay

5,0 (548 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

I’ve been ordering from StudyZoomer since I started college, and it is time to write my thankful review. You’ll never regret using this company!

View profile

Related Essays

Play Therapy

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Drug Abuse Challenge

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Evaluation

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Summaries of Hamlet Critiques

Pages: 1

(550 words)

Impact of Scholarships

Pages: 1

(275 words)