E.Q Radio

E.Q Radio
The presenter had an interesting topic, but they did not provide adequate information explaining how radio waves are of importance in telling an individual’s emotions. In the first slide, the presenter had images of a person showing different emotions, but they do not show any association with the E.Q frequency. The presenter should have used images that show the E.Q radio determining the emotions of a person rather than pictures of emotion. The presentation is shallow since the presenter did not explain the mechanism the EQ radio will apply to tell the feelings correctly. Further, the presenter uses a lot of abbreviations that pose a challenge to listeners since they have to keep asking the presenter what they mean. It is my belief that eight slides are not adequate to cover it entirely; hence the presenter should have done extra research. Besides the presenter does not show the sources of their content; hence raising questions about the credibility of the information provided.
The presenter uses a background that makes it impossible for the audience to read the information in the slides. The audience should not strain when reading and therefore the presenter should have used a background to enable the audience read the content in the slides. The presenter shows the advantage of the EQ radio but does not show adverse impacts of using this technology in determining emotions. Therefore, to make this presentation better, the presenter should have indicated the sources that formed the basis of their research.

The presenter should have shown the benefits and drawbacks of using the EQ radio. Lastly, the presenter should have changed the background and used a theme that makes it possible for the audience to read the content of the slides.
Inventors, schools, sexism, and politics
Carolina’s presentation is entirely visual since she has embraced images in all slides. The presenter should have limited the images used for the presentation so as to create room for explaining what the inventors discovered and the years they made their discoveries. The presenter should have arranged the inventions chronologically so as to enable the audience to see how technology changes have advanced. In the second slide, Carolina talks about the first computer program to be invented, but she does not tell the audience who created it or what was the name of the program. To strengthen her presentation, Carolina should have shown when, where and who invented the first computer program and why it was invented. Secondly, Carolina should have selected a different title for her presentation since it does not support her research.
Discrimination is another weakness that is evident in Carolina’s presentation. The presenter tends to be gender biased since she favors the women in her briefing. The presentation has several images of various inventors, but Carolina tends to incline on the female inventors. The presenter should have been gender sensitive and discussed male and female creators without any favoritism. Carolina further uses Alan Turing’s image in the second and third slides, therefore, raising questions about why she uses the same inventor twice. To better her presentation, Carolina should have discussed with equality both male and female inventors. Lastly, the presentation seems to be inclined on computer inventions, and she does not discuss politics or schools. Despite all negativity, Carolina’s presentation uses a background that enhances her content hence making her presentation appealing.