Essay: Conceptions Of The Administration And Its Relationship With Current Organizations

Essay: Conceptions of the Administration and its relationship with current organizations

Introduction

Mainly it is necessary to know the origin of the word administration, “from Latin adminu (from AD, A and Minist, serve), with the meaning of governing, governing and having goods . In Spanish, administer comes from Minister and this one, in turn, from Menester, who comes from the Latin Ministerium, which means service, employment or trade ”.

Understanding as follows, explained in the article origin and development of the administration administration, “it is the specific body responsible for making resources productive, that is, with the responsibility of organizing economic development, it reflects the essential spirit of The modern era ”the appearance of the administration is an event of main importance in social history in a few cases, if there are, a basically new institution, or some new leading group, have emerged as fast as the administration since the beginning of the century.

The recent styles of administration -related organizations show the following aspects that raise “modern administration is the one that guides its management towards the people of the company, achieving its effective collaboration to achieve institutional and personal objectives, through application of administrative process tools such as planning, organization, address and control ".

Developing

The administration is a discipline that has come for a long time, and that its beginnings are related long before the industrial revolution but had its primary implications better during this period as stated by the article origin and development of the administration, the systematic body of knowledge about the administration begins in full industrial revolution, in the 19th century, when the large companies that required new forms of organization and administrative practices arose.

The industrial company at large scale was something new.

For (Torres and Mejía) “Administration as a field of knowledge is made up of organizational theory, strategic management and organizational behavior knowledge whose application is in the definition of organizational activities, both at its management levels and in operations”. Among the advanced inquiries also found that, "the administration is shown as a group work in which the dependence on social, psychological, technical and economic forces is emphasized, which transcends the mechanistic vision of the classical administration".

Within the administration, its characteristics that allow a better understanding of this discipline:

• a) Universality The administrative phenomenon occurs wherever there is a social organism 
• b) specificity, the administrative phenomenon is specific and different from those that accompany 
• c) Temporary unit although stages, phases and elements of the administrative phenomenon are distinguished, this is unique and, therefore, at all times in the life of a company they are giving
• d) Hierarchical unit everyone who within a social organism has a boss, participates in different degrees and modalities in the same administration.

In this same order of ideas, the conception of administration can also be recognized from its importance which is, as indicated as follows, imparts effectiveness of human efforts. Helps get better staff, equipment, materials, money and human relationships. It remains at the forefront of changing conditions and provides forecast and creativity. The improvement is its constant watchword.

For its part Saldarriaga, states that:

The administration has been defined in different ways over time and one of the conceptualizations that it has endured and that is widely shared in the academic and business scenarios is the one that says that it is responsible for planning, organizing, directing and controlling the resources of the organization. From this conception also follows that which places it as an instrumental activity in which the human being is considered only a resource for production and in which there is an almost total absence of humanization, the mechanistic conception of the administration is a tradition that endures to this day. It is considered that its most important function is to increase productivity minimizing the resources invested to the maximum, which is almost always done through human management, assumed as an instrumental activity in which the human being is seen only by its ability to production.

Cited in Saldarriaga, from the postulates of Taylor and Fayol, the administration has conceived the human being, in the best case, as a tool for work and with Weber’s postulates about the ideal type of structuring of society and The organization and the need for rationalization of production, this conception is strengthened and the human being is conceived as another part of the company’s gear, which must be controlled by virtue of organizational efficiency, in the investigations carried out by Saldarriag that in these human management propensions at the universal level, it is sought to recognize the subject in the administration.

Mintzberg "reinforces the traditional concept of administration and its four basic pillars: planning, organization, direction and control, does not take into account administrative discipline as a theoretical construct or as a device for the production of possible knowledge of a social change," cited in Saldarriaga.

While Elton Mayo and his collaborators argue that, new relationships of relationship, adaptation and coordination within work organizations would be procured, more adequately considering the importance of the human factor in them and their impact on the performance of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of the operation of The same, making way to a humanistic approach.

At present, (Martínez, 2005) states that this process of change in information technology means profound changes within the organization and in the relationships they maintain with each other. It is enough to think about the exchange of computerized data, on the Internet, the reengineering of processes and systems, the flattening of structures and virtual or network organizations, to convince itself of organizational metamorphosis that results from computerization.

Discussions

Administration is a discipline that is found in every important historical moment but in turn, it has its rooted bases since the world advances so does the conception of the administration, in a world as changing as in which we We find which is increasingly competitive. We can affirm that the administration is adaptable and that it has a fundamental role in our daily lives, knowing the administration and its importance in organizations is indispensable, it is an arduous work that leads to organizations to improve their administrative processes in search of improvement that Comply with the goals, the achievements and that also provide the theoretical and practical tools to guide each other so that in this way, the maximization of the resources that are had from both parties so that the results are more profitable over time and to time and once more sustainable.

It is worth mentioning that although organizations have changes in one way or another, according to “between companies and their capital, in front of state organizations, their conception of the bureaucracy, and to some extent implies, a fair social compensation of the rights of the workers in the face of the abuses that were victims in the preceding simple, intuitive and improvised structures ”.

However, it is recognized that the relationship between these two disciplines is so important and relevant since one cannot survive without the other and both feedback all processes, over time organizations have advanced as well as the administration leaving aside many conceptions between them the treatment of their employees and the environment in which they are found since it is necessary to take an organization that takes into account the lacks and needs to achieve a balance.

Conclusions

Finally, it is mentioned that organizations have been having changes since the beginning, that is, they advance according to the needs that arise in the world Bridando, a sense of progress that allows the agreement of theories and practices developed by various problems in search of the best solution. Just as he raises (Martínez, 2005), hence the new century raises interesting challenges in the administrative and organizational field: review the prevailing mechanistic paradigm; resize the importance of scientificness, rationality and productivity; Getting rethinking the defense and recognition of the human being not only as an individual being, but as a collective being that determines the existence of the organization and, finally, proposing theories, models, methods and tools, which respond to specific temporary space conditions (P , 84).

Now, as it has been observed, it is necessary to recognize the close relationship between the administration and the organizations, one, cannot prevail without the other. Each is necessary to achieve adequate and productive development that not only allows you to meet goals but also offer the importance of its employees but also recognize the need for basic knowledge of the administration.

It is necessary to understand the administration as a design process, which maintains an environment full of people working as a team and that is formed by specialized groups. In these groups it is expected to optimize the responses given to improve both efficiency and efficiency to achieve shared goals and if required administrative and organizational changes.

Bibliography

• Livacic, c. (2009).Evolution of organizations: a world instead. Polytechnic Studies Magazine. VI VII, Nº 12, PP, 177-191.
• Martínez, J. (2005). Administration and organizations. Its evolutionary development and the proposals for the new century. Economic semester, vol. 8, no. 16, pp. 67-97.
• ORIGIN AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ADMINISTRATION. (2007). Perspectives, (20), recovered from: https: // www.Redalyc.org/pdf/4259/425942331004.PDF
• Restrepo, l., Estrada, S and López, M. (2009). Modern administration for results -oriented organizations. Scientia et Technica Year XV, No 41
• Saldarriaga, j. (2013).The subject’s conception in the administration: a look from human management. AUG.USB v. 14 No 1 pp. 1-325.
• Torres, H and Mejía, to. (2006).A contemporary vision of the concept of administration: review of the Colombian context. Block. Adm. Vol 19, num (32), pp, 111-133.