Knowledge In Natural Sciences And Their Relationship With The Past

Knowledge in natural sciences and their relationship with the past

As we already know, knowledge has been present throughout the evolution of the human being and has allowed it to develop and change the way it has lived and will continue its path, it is worth mentioning that society has also evolved through knowledge both both bothLike past knowledge, resulting in the presence of innovation in technology. When talking about current knowledge and past knowledge we refer to the shared knowledge that is defined as that more structured knowledge that has been elaborated by one or more individuals, and this same knowledge can be changed over time. By saying that current knowledge depends totally on past knowledge, it implies that there is a dependency, which states that current knowledge will always depend on the past since all ideas are changing and adapting to what society thinks of society inmoment, which leads me to formulate will there be any current knowledge that does not depend on past knowledge?, It must be taken into account that in order to develop or for improved knowledge, it is necessarythat depending on past knowledge, resulting in the following knowledge question, to what extent does the shared knowledge of the past exist currently improved knowledge?. It will be analyzed through the ADC of Natural Sciences and History

In natural sciences, current knowledge will always depend on past knowledge based on existing theories.

As we already know, natural sciences are those factual sciences, these are based on experimentation to verify theories, it is worth mentioning that natural sciences will always be in development and evolving.

That is why it is affirmed that the current knowledge of this factual science will always depend on past discoveries, so that scientists to create or improve past knowledge will be based on existing theories, so they will take into account a shared knowledge, whatthat allows us to demonstrate that the natural sciences if they depend on the shared knowledge of the past in order to evolve and be able to develop new knowledge today.

Knowledge in natural sciences will always depend on shared knowledge that have been transmitted through experiences, which are exposed to changes, due to the development of human beings and the advancement of technology, which is whyHe affirms that current knowledge in natural sciences depends on past knowledge or discoveries, a clear example of that is Anaximandro’s theory of Miletus in the sixth century to.C, this theory is that the Earth was flat, he believed that the Earth was a short cylinder with a flat and circular surface. The majority of people believed in that theory, however Plato, Aristotle who gave a reasoned explanation of why the earth is a sphere and cited a value for its circumference that is correct within a factor of two and Eratóstenes gave a more estimatecorrect of its circumference in the fourth and second centuries.C, contradicted that theory. Then the Bible contradicted them until Copernico and Galileo (s. XVI and XVII) demonstrated with real data that the earth is really round. It can be clearly observed that the knowledge of today, on the aforementioned theory (the earth is round) depends totally on the knowledge and research of the past (contradictions of the earth’s shape). Without the knowledge of the past, the knowledge of the present would not have become more thoroughly and possibly. But is it possible that there is any current knowledge in the natural sciences that does not depend on past knowledge?, Yes, since if current knowledge depended only on those discoveries past today there would be no possibility of new creations or discoveries, but rather we would only be expanding more, those already pre -existing knowledge. However, it should be taken into account that the scientists of these factual sciences mostly need research or theories already existing and thus be able to continue investigating, in short the current knowledge in the natural sciences depends largely on the past knowledge of the past knowledge, but we must also take into account those discoveries that have not depended on past studies.

Current knowledge in history depends totally on past knowledge, which have granted historical through the historical sources of that past made.

We must take into account that history is considered the ADC that studies the past registered in historical sources by historians, and is based on providing knowledge about everything that happened in the past in order to understand what happens in the present and, in themeasure of the possible, prevent what will happen in the future. It is worth mentioning that the story is also considered as that reality that is present in each individual, that is, the story is relative, interpretive and not all have the same meanings or coincide in the perceptions they get to have about something, it is so thatIn this way reason fulfills a fundamental role within history, since reason is considered as the action of thinking in order to understand the facts and thus be able to act in it;History will always be the story. And that will not be able to change since they were events of the past that people still remember. This story can be analyzed from different perspectives and based on it, new knowledge is created or evolved. So it is said that current knowledge depends totally on the knowledge of the past. An example of the aforementioned: a student who lacks knowledge about the cold war, for intuition resorts to sources either primary or secondary, in this case I would choose to watch videos, read books produced or written by historians about that historical fact, byTherefore, at the end of interpreting and analyzing the selected sources, it will resultThat language plays an important role, since current knowledge also depends on the way past knowledge will be transmitted.

In history, shared knowledge is denoted and this knowledge has been transmitted from history to historian, through different historical sources, whether primary or secondary, as mentioned above, history also depends on the different perspectives, since I consider that theHistory is relative and interpretive, and these same perspectives are those that help improve the present, so it follows that current knowledge depends totally on the past. But on the other hand it is that history is history and does not influence large -scale. Therefore, it would be believed that the knowledge of the past would not influence would not influence the knowledge of today, it is worth mentioning that history chooses to take into account historical facts that have caused a greater impact on the world, however historyYou will always have a dependence on historical sources, since without these records it would be lacking knowledge of those historical facts.

In conclusion, in natural sciences knowledge is acquired through experiences (discoveries), and these depend completely on pre -existing theories, which is why it is affirmed that current knowledge depends on knowledge of the past, which allows this knowledge obtained fromthroughout the technological or scientific advancement will be improved, but current knowledge is also taken into account that do not depend on past knowledge resulting in an innovation in science. On the other hand, in history it is affirmed that current knowledge depends largeBoth the past knowledge in history is significant to obtain improved knowledge and thus make a better approach and thus better define a historical event.

References

1. Graham, d. (2013). Does Anaximens have a theory of change? Topics, Philosophy Magazine, 25 (1), 11 – 18. AVAILABLE AT: https: // doi.org/10.21555/Top.V25I1.27
2. Anaximandro, Fragments and Commentary, Arthur Fairbanks, ed. and trad., (Plut., Strom. two;Dox. 579);cited by Hanover Historical Texts Project.