The Adoption Of Egalitarian Or Single -Parent Marriages

The adoption of egalitarian or single -parent marriages

Introduction

The adoption of egalitarian or single -parent marriages is one of the new schemes of family relationships that have been presented with modernity and equality, the people who integrate societies show two positions those who are in favor and those who are against, anotherelement that societies in the world try to protect is the physical and psychological health of minors with laws that put some universal restrictions such as the fact in adoption of classical families, constituted by father and mother.

Developing

But it is also true that egalitarian marriages are won their social and legal space, more and more states are in the world that has legalized marriages, de fact, in this type of event;Another variable the psychological appears, to what extent this is healthy for the way, its personality will be affected by placing it in this type of environments. The United States is one of the countries with states that deliver same -sex couples to children. There are few countries that regulate equal marriage, these are Holland, Belgium, Canada, Spain, South Africa, Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Iceland and Argentina.

The countries that regulate equal marriages and allow adoption are: Sweden, Denmark, Germany, some cities in Spain, so it shows greater flexibility in the countries of Europe.

In Latin America we see that Argentina is one of the countries that allows adoption in egalitarian marriages, according to some studies taken as a reference the children of single -parent families have no differences with the children of classical families.

Nicaragua in a overlapping way leaves the possibility open without taking a radical posture for or against, Portugal also at first rejected single -parent adoption has now become a minority form.

In Ecuador, the adoption of egalitarian marriages is not yet recognized, although a reform that allows marriage, is also true as we said the positions of many social groups is in favor and against.

The previous criterion is very coherent, as citizens and even more as social work professionals we have moral responsibility with those children who already come with the psychological burden of abandonment or the circumstance that they had to live, as to worsen their circumstances with an irresponsible adoption, concern is valid although it cannot be generalized, people with egalitarian relationships mostly have their own crises and the questionable is whether they are adequate mental health to train a child with responsibility, love, respect, without exerting pressure onThe child’s identity and sexual trends, a thorough intervention of the valued is needed so that there is no consequences to regret. This is explained in the following section.

conclusion

As social workers we are in the responsibility of guaranteeing a family and a healthConflicts and feelings, both for parents and for the children of the new family and seeking a healthy adaptation is the responsibility of all the actors in this process.

It must then be made a serious study of each case and especially of the adopting families, always putting as a priority the well -being of the infant in all areas of his life leaving aside prejudices, personal interests, collective sensationalisms, adoption must respond to theRigid study of the case with a relevant intervention model, bearing in mind that what we are putting in the hands of a couple are human beings and the successes or errors will depend all of the life this human being, therefore adoption becomes a responsibilitysocial of great impact for the individual and collective well -being of a society.