The Civil War Conflict In Syria

The civil war conflict in Syria

Introduction

The Arab Republic of Syria suffered in 2011 the beginning of an armed conflict due to disagreements between the government led by President Bashar Al-Va and the opposition (the Syrian National Council). Bashar al-ásead came to power in a hereditary way when his father, Háfez al-áád, died. In this way, when Bashar Al-Vasad assumed the presidency he met the political opposition and with the disagreement of the people, which protested against the new corrupt government. The immediate trigger for the destabilization of the country were the Arab springs, a protest movement that spread throughout all Arab countries asking for more democracy. When they arrive in Syria, a son ends up using the army and in the clashes about a thousand people die. 

Developing

Conflicts will climb until they become a civil war, of which there is no exact start date. But, we must also take into account the fact that not only a war in Syria is happening, but in other countries such as Iraq, Yemen, there are some countries that are acting as a host country, since according to the article, it allows the prohibitionof expulsion and return of the Convention on the Statute of Refugees, made in Geneva, have the right and obligation to host them without discriminating for their race, religion, nationality, belonging to a certain social group or their political opinions if it in itYour life or freedom is in danger. Despite this, some countries deny this humanitarian aid for various reasons, 

among which are the fear of instability, speaking of political stability within its borders and the demographic balance, since they suppose an increase in the volume of the population and have no means to attend them. However, these countries are forced by law because they must comply with the treaties proposed by UNHCR and the UN. Last June the Spanish NGO proactive Open Arms was notified that if its humanitarian ship ‘Open Arms’ resumed the bailouts of migrants that are drifting in the central Mediterranean after the closure of ports from countries such as Italy or Malta, it could be sanctionedWith fines of up to 901.000 euros. This is where the stability of legality and human rights in immigration policy begins to question. 

After preventing these countries, access to its ports, the ship has been forced to navigate thousands of kilometers to find a safe port. Is the performance of the Open ARMS NGOs legal regarding the rescue of migrants on the high seas? All captains of any ship have the obligation to help who is in danger in the sea without taking into account the circumstances in which they are. Article 98: duty to help the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, 1982 provides that states have to force the captains of ships that navigate under their flag to help any person who is inDanger in the sea as long as it does not pose a danger to the ship.

In addition to forcing them to address all possible speed to help people who are in danger, as soon as they know they need relief and whenever they have a reasonable possibility of doing so. In addition, to the above the rule gives weight: relief situations: obligations and procedures of Chapter V of the Solas Convention (International Agreement for the Safety of Human Life in the Sea), according to which the captain of a ship that is inConditions to help, when receiving information from any type of source indicating that there are people in danger at sea, you must go at maximum speed to help, informing about it if possible to these people or to the search and rescue service. 

We also have that in several maritime agreements there is the obligation of states to guarantee relief communications and coordination in their responsibility zone, as well as the rescue of people in danger at sea near their coasts. A person rescued at sea can affirm that he is a refugee or asylum seeker, or show in some way that he is afraid of being persecution if it is landed in a specific place, so he must respect the right of refugees. The captains of the ships do not have the responsibility of determining the legal status of the rescued people, that is, they are falling on the NGO responsibilities of others, since there are states "washing their hands".

conclusion

We have a refugee is a person who is afraid of being persecuted for reasons of race, nationality, social group or political opinions, who is outside the country of his nationality and cannot or cannot, because of these fears, to acceptThe protection of such a country. On the other hand, we have that an asylum applicant is a person in search of international protection and the request from which he has not been resolved definitively. The article shows the Convention on the Statute of Refugees prohibits expelling or returning to refugees or asylum seekers to places where their life or freedom is in danger for reasons of race, religion, nationality, social group or political opinions.