The Reform In Peru

The reform in Peru

Introduction

The reform or change of a constitution is an event by which our nation in approximately two hundred years of republican life that has experienced during our history. They are twelve constitutions that since 1823 have been heated our constitutional life until today. These texts establish an ideology that serves to guide the organisms of the country as its inhabitants. The 1839 text was conservative that thanked the landowners who did not agree with the Peruvian-Bolivian Confederation by removing the clause of the 1834 Constitution by which every slave when entering the Peruvian State was released. 

Developing

Originating what we call today about people. The antagonistic was the one of 1856 considered the most liberal and abolitionist constitution of the country. Prohibited the death penalty, but it only lasted four years. The opposite was that of 1860 known as the moderate. There was one of 1867 that lasted a year because the 1860 in force until 1920 was resumed. But its validity was to some extent more semantic because other legal bodies had greater value. Only the attribution given to the judge to repeal a rule for being contrary to the Constitution is assumed from 1979. 

If economic issues are treated in 1979, it designated that the Peruvian economy was a market social while the 1993 also says the same, but think more about a market economy. Social rights are more a fact that are introduced to constitutions from 1920; The same as the right to education The regulation of work schedule is established the right to free unionization.

They are even a more legislative and constitutional fact. Thus we have work accident law is 1911; Textile guilds appear.

The norms begin the way so that the constitutions then perpetuate them. The constitutional reform agenda that the country needs, must be focused on the structure of the State. The main stumbling block that Peru has to advance in its path to development lies in its political disorganization, which does not allow to achieve a modern constitutional democracy, in which there is an effective alternation of parties in power, in the style of the most developed countries. Peru will not deserve greater confidence on the part of savers and investors if each electoral process.

It implies a possibility of jumping into a vacuum. The democratic process must be open, but not to the point of allowing the arrival of those who clearly do not believe in it. It should not be sensitive to an instrumentalization for absolutist options. However, the roots of the problem of the fragility of Peruvian democracy lie not only, in the institutions of mandatory suffrage and the proportional representation system. Both institutions encourage the generation of situations of little or no democratic governance, especially when combined with a system of government.

In which there is no clear computer principle. To advance its development process, therefore, adjustments to the current Peruvian constitutional model are required. However, embarking on the country in a re -foundation of the Republic would imply taking unnecessary risks and nothing would ensure results superior to those achieved so far especially when combined with a system of government in which there is no clear computer principle. To advance its development process, it is therefore required to make adjustments to the current Peruvian constitutional model.

conclusion

Embarcating the country in a re -foundation of the Republic would imply taking unnecessary risks and nothing would ensure results superior to those achieved so far especially when combined with a system of government in which there is no clear computer principle. To advance its development process, therefore, adjustments to the current Peruvian constitutional model are required. However, embarking on the country in a re -foundation of the Republic would imply taking unnecessary risks and nothing would ensure results superior to those achieved so far.