Ashequible And Social Housing

Ashequible and social housing

Introduction

The problem of social housing is a topic very analyzed by the different technical and social disciplines, including architects, directly related to housing and how to elaborate it, due to the complexity that it presents from its first appearances. The industrial revolution arrived and with it all its consequences, the industries with their great enclosures were installed in the metropolis, in turn in these they were directly dependent on their operators. This, making a direct equation, leads to the exodus from the countryside to the city that these operators exerted, and thus, it often concluded in superpoblation of the metropolis.

Developing

To face the problem of social housing, different questions and resolutions emerge with respect to this that have converged in our times as typological and buildative solutions, they last from the modern period of the last century to the present. In the course of this essay, four works of different years, contexts and places are selected, ordering them for the periods established by the exercise pattern.

Regarding contemporary works, the Gifu Housing Building was selected. Located in Gifu Kitagata, Japan. Authorship of Sejima and Sekkei, from the SANAA Group. And the Jardim Edit. Located in San Pablo, Brazil;Authorship of the group of two studies, that of Marta Moreira, Milton Braga and Fernando de Mello;and that of Eduardo Ferroni and Pablo Hereñú. Corresponding to the interwar period will be involved the Narkomfin building.

Located in Moscow, Russia. Authorship of Moisei Ginzburg and Ignaty Milinis. And the Bergpolder housing building. Located in the city of Rotterdam, Holland;Its authors were Brikman, Willen van Tijen and Van der Vlugt.

To begin, the four cases studied respond to different topics within the concept of social housing. For premature justification, we will mention the most important conductive thread of the choice of the four most works that share the social housing family, but, the most eloquent for the purposes of our essay will be the runner street and the benefits and also disenchantmentswho possesses this typology.

conclusion

The buildings selected for the study are from different parts of the world, immersed in different contexts and visions, but in our opinion with similar typological and theoretical solutions, in the case of contemporaries, both projects are part of a set, so differentpro -andctal keys respond to a logic of grouping and not insulation as a way of contributing to life in society.  We see how this way of implanting in the city goes from a smaller unit, isolated housing, to a major unit, the complex, or, even more, the city. Rafael Moneos values the urban aspects of the buildings themselves, according to him.