Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

Implications Of The Peloponnese War In Greece

0 / 5. 0

Words: 673

Pages: 2

48

Implications of the Peloponnese War in Greece

In the first place, it is necessary to resume and analyze the main implications that the Peloponnese war had for the Greek context for both the time in which the confrontation lasted and later, since its consequences do not extend only to the years immediately after theConflict termination: on the contrary, such consequences had a great impact on political and economic events that occurred several years later.

Thus, the first thing that attracts attention is the economic and commercial power that Athens was having years prior to the conflict after the signing of a peace treaty with neighboring cities in the year 445.C. Naturally, such a prosperity experienced by Athens later resulted in an economic, political and military power superior to the other cities, which undoubtedly generated friction and minor clashes that then climbed into a conflict of greater magnitude after Sparta, another otherCity of Great Power, warfare to this to avoid the excessive growth of its military, economic and political power, giving rise to the confrontation between the League of Delos, headed by Athens, and the Sparta League, at the head of Sparta.

It should be noted that it was not only a military confrontation due to the domain of one city over another: it was, in short, the struggle between two powers for the prevalence of a whole political, economic and even social system throughout the Greek sphere, prosperous and powerful at that time.

Wait! Implications Of The Peloponnese War In Greece paper is just an example!

In this sense, it should be remembered that both Athens and Sparta possessed totally different political systems, because while in this last city the form of oligarchic government (Aristoi) predominated, in the first it was democracy that prevailed (demos). However, the differences between both powers were not limited to their respective political systems, because more than a different form of government, the way of both Athenians and Spartans represented the two predominant forms of society in ancient Greece, hencethat the Peloponneous War will charge an unusual significance, although its consequences were more harmful in the short term. Precisely, one of the struggles that occurred outside the military country. In this sense, the discourse given by the philosopher Athenacoras in the Syracuse Assembly is totally valid because, as indicated, both forms of government were in dispute due to their prevalence. This becomes more relevant if it is considered that it was not only a dominant form of government for these two powers, but for a whole Greek political sphere. In addition, Athenacoras speaks in a context in which democracy was still in its most primitive form, so it is possible to affirm that such form of Athenian government was still in its experimentation phase and obeyed a context and a specific time and at a specific timein which, in some way, the rules of the game were clear. However, it is important to highlight that in Sparta the oligarchy did not occur in the way in which it occurred during the Middle Ages or in more recent times, so that its characteristics and particularities can only be limited to the context and the Spartan model.

On the other hand, the intervention of Athenacoras is totally enlightening and telling as long as it gives an account of a perception of the democracy of an era. With his words, this philosopher, then conversed to Christianity, exposes part of the thought and the Athenian worldview regarding politics and democracy. Not only this, but also presents, from the rhetorical field, arguments for which the demos had to prevail over the Aristoi. The latter allows us to glimpse that the war was carried out in fields that transcended the merely military. Finally, it is interesting to note that even in such an early era lived by mitters, this thinker already glimpsed the consequences that could happen if a form of oligarchic government was implanted: the oligarchy, on the other hand, shares with the majorBenefits does not take only most, but even snatched all of them and retains them .. 

Get quality help now

Ryder Croft

5.0 (610 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

I am grateful to studyzoomer.com for their exceptional essay writing service. The writer provided a well-structured and thought-provoking essay that impressed me.

View profile

Related Essays

Literature Research Proposal

Pages: 1

(275 words)

PARIS

Pages: 1

(275 words)

International conflict

Pages: 1

(275 words)

other

Pages: 1

(275 words)

history of america answered

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Leonard Bernstein

Pages: 1

(275 words)