Free Essay SamplesAbout UsContact Us Order Now

Influence Of Alejandro El Grande Ell Macedonian Kingdom

0 / 5. 0

Words: 883

Pages: 3

68

Influence of Alejandro el Grande Ell Macedonian Kingdom

To begin, it is noteworthy that the Macedonic Army, one of the most important and powerful of antiquity, not only led to this Macedonian kingdom to power and domination throughout Greece thanks to the military inventions introduced by Philip II and then perfected byAlexander the Great;It was the social cohesion and union of the entire population and the king with the nobles that led to the kingdom of Macedonia to show power for a long period. War and combat soon became a lifestyle for Macedonians, which before the arrival of Philip only saw military activities as an additional occupation after the culture season. In this sense, it is possible to affirm that the great military and strategic innovations led to the Filipo II of Macedonia reaching relatively easy and soon power. This, in turn, provided the kingdom with a unity and social cohesion that did not exist before, causing the confrontations of the Macedonic Army to be effective and its truly effective and influential victories in all aspects of the social life of the kingdom, which graduallyHe would give the opportunity to this, at the head of his king, to conquer territories beyond the Greek sphere and be one of the most powerful of classical and Hellenistic antiquity. As a consequence, it is feasible to talk about a military monarchy because Filipo II, from its imprisonment in Thebes, realized all the important advantages that the strengthening and improvement of the army could bring.

Wait! Influence Of Alejandro El Grande Ell Macedonian Kingdom paper is just an example!

The Macedonic Falange, more effective and better structured than the traditional Greek phalanx, is a clear example of this. On the other hand, to the military power is added the strategic behavior of Philip and his ability to preside. Precisely, this could be one of the factors that led to this king to success, because it is well known by historians that the strength of a monarch is partly given by its ability to control and face a nobility. Louis XIV, King Sun, exemplified centuries later that premise by minimizing the power of the nobility and becoming just a judge, monarch and priest. This led to Philip II practice during ancient times, hence he became a powerful king. The above is also related to the position of the Macedonian king as primus interparers between the nobility, which gave him the opportunity to prevail over this without dismeritting or provoking his anger. In short, the balance between the power of the nobility and that of the king, together with the appearance of a powerful and effective army were two of the most important elements that led Filipo to be remembered for posterity. which gave him the opportunity to prevail over this without dismeritating or provoking his anger. In short, the balance between the power of the nobility and that of the king, together with the appearance of a powerful and effective army were two of the most important elements that led Filipo to be remembered for posterity. which gave him the opportunity to prevail over this without dismeritating or provoking his anger. In short, the balance between the power of the nobility and that of the king, together with the appearance of a powerful and effective army were two of the most important elements that led Filipo to be remembered for posterity.

These components, of vital importance for the survival of the Macedonian kingdom, were perfected and intensified by their son, Alejandro III of Macedonia or Alexander the Great, one of the most powerful strategists and military of his time.

It is possible to determine that the correct execution of such weapons by Alexander the Great, along with their skills in the political field, allowed it to conquer immense territories, even beyond Bosphorus. It should also be noted that the preparation that his father gave him, exclusive and ideal to assume the throne and power initiated by this, contributed to making Alexander the Great an irrefutable leader and strategist, perhaps the most important of ancient times, even being evenalong with other strategists such as Julio César or Trajan.

It should be noted, meanwhile, that Alexander the Great surpassed Philip as he could transcend the characteristic military power of his father and take his influence beyond the Greek zone, giving rise to a period of unique cultural exchange in what was known as theHellenistic period. Also, his victory over the Persian empire with a small army is perhaps one of the greatest and most remembered achievements of an army in ancient times.

Finally, it can be indicated that his immense power and conquest ability was only detained for his Early Death at the age of 32. However, it is also noteworthy that its weak or even non -existent dominance over various regions of Asia contributed to the weakening of their empire. Similarly, not having left a clear heir led to characters like Philip III Ardonio and then Alejandro IV took power, something that would progressively lead to the sunset and decline of his empire, since it was the generals of these who truly stoppedPower, but its strategic capacity and the struggles between these were not a sufficiently effective glue to keep an empire of millions of inhabitants and miles of square kilometers cohesive.  

Get quality help now

Top Writer

Sam Cooper

5.0 (194 reviews)

Recent reviews about this Writer

I am impressed with the professionalism and quality of service at studyzoomer.com. The essay writer delivered a well-researched and well-written essay that exceeded my expectations.

View profile

Related Essays

Literature Research Proposal

Pages: 1

(275 words)

PARIS

Pages: 1

(275 words)

International conflict

Pages: 1

(275 words)

other

Pages: 1

(275 words)

history of america answered

Pages: 1

(275 words)

Leonard Bernstein

Pages: 1

(275 words)