CAP # 5 Feedback

Critically Appraised Paper Peer Rubric (CAP)
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points Both the title and the PICO question have been clearly stated.
10 points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The article has a relevant clinical statement which evaluates the impact of group-based behavioral exercise programs to reduce and prevent urinary incontinence.
The paper has a clearly stated clinical bottom line.
20 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides comprehensive information regarding how the intervention led to improved physical performance among older women. The paper explains how an occupational therapist can apply the knowledge to help old women improve their physical performance.
30 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial statement of study strengths and limitations for both or one article incomplete
20 points Limited statement of study strength and/or threat in both articles
10 points The article outlines the strengths, limitations, and measures of validity.

The paper does not account for the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
20 points
Proper grammar, use of syntax and delivery of information Consistent use of proper grammar, spelling, syntax and clear delivery of information
10 points One-three errors in spelling, grammar, etc.
5 points More than three errors in spelling, syntax, and grammar
3 points The delivery of information is satisfactory although there are a few grammar and syntax errors.
5 points
Proper referencing format listed articles (APA or AMA)
Citations in the proper format
5 points More than two APA or format errors
3 points No citation formatting
1 point The reference is provided and appropriately cited throughout the paper.
5 points
TOTAL 90 points
Comments:
The article provides comprehensive information regarding existing literature, what the authors researched and considerations for future research. According to the authors, group-based, behavioral exercise program does not offer effective among older women with urinary incontinence. Instead, the intervention can be used by occupation therapists to help old women improve their physical performance. The paper provides a comprehensive review of the article with an emphasis on how the knowledge acquired can be applied by occupational therapists. However, there are a few issues which need to be addressed. The “Head” in the header should be “head.” There are also numerous grammar errors; the paper needs to be checked with the Grammarly Software. The paper does not provide an extensive review of the strengths and weaknesses of the article because some of the information that is supposed to feature in the clinical bottom line is missing. A typical example is whether the findings of the study are worth generalizing.