Psychology research

Psychology
Name
Institutional Affiliation
It is essential to interpret the result of a research project to achieve clarity and eradicate room for misinterpretation. When a researcher fails to explain the findings suitably the audience of this study is left with a room where he/she may misinterpret the data. Therefore there is a need to interpret to eradicate this room.
Interpreting the data systematically in a high-quality research project assist the researcher in displaying his expertise in that field. A researcher needs to explain the data clearly to prove his expertise whereby an audience is reading the result he/she can judge an expert researcher in that particular field and a novice (Gough et al. 2017). The other reason is that well-interpreted findings shed light on the problem of the study. Interpretation of the data helps an audience to see the light on the problem of the study. Therefore, the audience can understand the study well.
The two main advantages are, help for deciding the research resources, it always gives quality research content. By understanding the intrinsic meaning of data, one can record a particular situation or activity thus it assists to capture the real event. The other benefit is that it aids in providing qualitative research. Once data is gathered and stored it can be transferred back to information by compiling and analyzing the data. Therefore this act of examining and understanding intrinsic data help in that process of providing qualitative research.

The three disadvantages are; causing data error, the data may prompt misty information and respondents may feel uneasy responding. The first disadvantage is that it might cause data error whereby respondents may decide to react in a certain way because other individuals failed to respond thus influencing inclination. The other disadvantage is that it makes some respondents uneasy because other individuals aren’t responding to this vast data. Moreover, since the data is too vast, it results in misty information because few individuals will bother going through it.
Reference
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews. Sage.